View Full Version : Penske Buys Saturn
HTM Yaris
06-05-2009, 07:43 PM
I wonder if this means that we ( USA ) will be getting some killer new cars .... I hope :bow::bow::bow::headbang::headbang::headbang:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/GM-to-sell-Saturn-brand-to-apf-15450535.html;_ylt=AmfF_UqBYjLAsqp1F2HMMKCCfNdF
TLyttle
06-05-2009, 10:33 PM
Should be interesting, alright...
tuckevalastin
06-05-2009, 10:43 PM
the Aura, Outlook, and Vue are going to stick around for a few years and then it's likely that Renault-Nissan vehicles are going to be rebadged as Saturns under Penske.
Rumor has it the Renault-Samsung vehicles are likely choices, if so then Saturn will just be another pointless brand since they are all just rebadged Nissans anyway. But I bet Penske wouldn't mind importing some of the current Renault lineup.
darthbauer
06-05-2009, 11:17 PM
Now someone needs to buy hummer and put the HX into production.
tuckevalastin
06-05-2009, 11:35 PM
the Chinese already bought HUMMER and I doubt GM is too worried about helping them get the HX built
yaris-me
06-06-2009, 03:34 AM
Penske should have bought GM.:biggrin:
GeneW
06-06-2009, 08:25 AM
I wonder if this means that we ( USA ) will be getting some killer new cars .... I hope :bow::bow::bow::headbang::headbang::headbang:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/GM-to-sell-Saturn-brand-to-apf-15450535.html;_ylt=AmfF_UqBYjLAsqp1F2HMMKCCfNdF
They'll be in DIRECT COMPETITION with GM. Wish 'em luck.
Gene
darthbauer
06-07-2009, 09:09 PM
the Chinese already bought HUMMER and I doubt GM is too worried about helping them get the HX built
I could careless if GM wants to help or not, I just want one.
BailOut
06-07-2009, 09:23 PM
I could careless if GM wants to help or not, I just want one.
I bet you also want cheap cost, easy-to-find refueling stations, cheap fuel and a safe fuel cell, none of which are any more real today than the vehicle you speak of.
By the time hydrogen fuel cells are viable they will already be obsolete, at best relegated to range extenders for other propulsion systems. Battery electric vehicles (BEV, or EV) are the future.
tuckevalastin
06-07-2009, 09:53 PM
I could careless if GM wants to help or not, I just want one.
Well then watch Transformers 2 and dream about what could have been for HUMMER... I know that's what I'll be doing
darthbauer
06-08-2009, 02:10 AM
I bet you also want cheap cost, easy-to-find refueling stations, cheap fuel and a safe fuel cell, none of which are any more real today than the vehicle you speak of.
By the time hydrogen fuel cells are viable they will already be obsolete, at best relegated to range extenders for other propulsion systems. Battery electric vehicles (BEV, or EV) are the future.
Why does it seem like I'm getting attacked over just liking a car to the point of wanting one? I know i have not been on that much for a while but jeez you people got moody. Have you never saw something that you liked and wanted one? That's all im saying.
BailOut
06-08-2009, 02:37 AM
Why does it seem like I'm getting attacked over just liking a car to the point of wanting one? I know i have not been on that much for a while but jeez you people got moody. Have you never saw something that you liked and wanted one? That's all im saying.
It's important to understand that you are not being attacked; your idea is. No matter what propulsion system the Hummer (or any other over-sized vehicle) uses it will always and forever be an absolute pig for using more resources than necessary to be created (you simply do not need a 7,000 pound vehicle to move your human-sized ass around) and to move around (even if it ran on solar power it would require an inexcusable amount of solar panels and batteries to function as compared to realistic vehicles).
Hydrogen fuel cells are also a touchy subject as the AAMA keeps going on and on about it and marketing it despite it being a far off, under-delivering and tertiary idea that a lot of resources are being dedicated to instead of more pragmatic options.
darthbauer
06-08-2009, 02:58 AM
It's important to understand that you are not being attacked; your idea is. No matter what propulsion system the Hummer (or any other over-sized vehicle) uses it will always and forever be an absolute pig for using more resources than necessary to be created (you simply do not need a 7,000 pound vehicle to move your human-sized ass around) and to move around (even if it ran on solar power it would require an inexcusable amount of solar panels and batteries to function as compared to realistic vehicles).
So you think there should be no SUV's or trucks, or vans or anything other than subcompact cars? Have you ever had to transport anything around other than, as you put it, your human-sized ass?
ka0sx
06-08-2009, 03:17 AM
wrong darth, the word is necessity AND
http://jaysolomon.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/common_sense.jpg
BailOut
06-08-2009, 03:18 AM
So you think there should be no SUV's or trucks, or vans or anything other than subcompact cars? Have you ever had to transport anything around other than, as you put it, your human-sized ass?
The entire country of Japan gets by just fine without a single vehicle any larger than a typical minivan.
The entirety of Europe gets by with little more.
Studies have shown that in the U.S. less than 3% of all SUVs and trucks are ever used for anything other than commuting and basic errand-running.
I have fit 350 pounds of e-cycling equipment in my Yaris. 4 adults with snow gear and skis/snowboards on the back. 3 adults and 2 mountain bikes on the back. A big pile of dirt. Landscaping stone for a neighbor. 2 dogs, one at 75 pounds and the other at 45 pounds. A mini-fridge and microwave. 3 bicycles and 2 scooters. 2 2U servers, installation tools and equipment, portable cart, portable chairs and 2 overnight bags. When I want larger loads moved I have them delivered or rent a truck.
I have seen a Suburban used to carry a bouquet of flowers. An H2 to carry a bin of mail. A Ram 3500 used by a suburban commuter as his daily driver.
The reality shown here is that incredibly few people need anything larger than a compact, and the industrial sector doesn't need vehicles even 1/2 the size of what they have.
The unchecked and out of control consumption in America has spawned unadulterated excess such as the Hummer. One cannot expect to come into a subcompact car forum, visit a thread regarding a manufacturer of mostly compact and subcompact vehicles, then post about pining for the vehicle that has come to represent everything that is wrong with American largess and environmental apathy and not expect to get called out for it. :iono:
JBougie
06-08-2009, 04:06 AM
It's great that you're saying people shouldn't be able to buy whatever the hell their freedom having asses want to buy .... not everyone bought a compact car becuase it is good for the environment.
I was going to buy an H3, Escalade or a Denali - but I thought the Yaris was cuter and it is better on gas so it won in the end. I have no issues with spending $50k+ on a big ass gas guzzling truck or SUV.
Why? Because I can
Why? Because I like them
Why? Because they look awesome sitting on 22"s (or 24"s) with tinted windows
Why? Because I work 40+ hours a week and feel I can spend my money on whatever I want to
WHO CARES if we don't NEED them to get around. People don't NEED a lot of things, but we buy them/own them becuase it was created and is available for purchase.
Good for you if you can pack 2390843 bikes and 3267 people into your Yaris while driving up hill and still getting 50MPG. Not everyone wants that or gives a shit if they can do that. So it may work for you, but you shouldn't jump in someones shit for not following your belief pattern.
ka0sx
06-08-2009, 04:10 AM
It's great that you're saying people shouldn't be able to buy whatever the hell their freedom having asses want to buy .... not everyone bought a compact car becuase it is good for the environment.
I was going to buy an H3, Escalade or a Denali - but I thought the Yaris was cuter and it is better on gas so it won in the end. I have no issues with spending $50k+ on a big ass gas guzzling truck or SUV.
Why? Because I can
Why? Because I like them
Why? Because they look awesome sitting on 22"s (or 24"s) with tinted windows
Why? Because I work 40+ hours a week and feel I can spend my money on whatever I want to
WHO CARES if we don't NEED them to get around. People don't NEED a lot of things, but we buy them/own them becuase it was created and is available for purchase.
Good for you if you can pack 2390843 bikes and 3267 people into your Yaris while driving up hill and still getting 50MPG. Not everyone wants that or gives a shit if they can do that. So it may work for you, but you shouldn't jump in someones shit for not following your belief pattern.
well, excuse me dear sir/mam for not being a cattle.
JBougie
06-08-2009, 04:22 AM
well, excuse me dear sir/mam for not being a cattle.
Huh?
BailOut
06-08-2009, 11:03 AM
Hi JBougie,
While formulating a lengthy response in my head I realized that someone has already put my thoughts into a video presentation. Please take 20 minutes to watch The Story of Stuff (http://www.storyofstuff.com).
darthbauer
06-08-2009, 12:20 PM
Your yaris was still made with "stuff".
I drive a Yaris because i have a long commute. If I did not have to drive that far to work, i would drive something bigger and faster. Why? Because i can, because it's more fun. Sure my Yaris is fun at times but being in that little ass car after awhile gets old.
I maybe by some of your standards "cattle" or "sheep" but at least i'm not a god damn hippie. This thread is a joke.
TLyttle
06-08-2009, 01:07 PM
Well, this thread started out fairly civilised...
ka0sx
06-08-2009, 01:42 PM
Your yaris was still made with "stuff".
I drive a Yaris because i have a long commute. If I did not have to drive that far to work, i would drive something bigger and faster. Why? Because i can, because it's more fun. Sure my Yaris is fun at times but being in that little ass car after awhile gets old.
I maybe by some of your standards "cattle" or "sheep" but at least i'm not a god damn hippie. This thread is a joke.
Was not referring to you in this case, was referring to hello kitty.
darthbauer
06-08-2009, 02:06 PM
wrong darth, the word is necessity AND
http://jaysolomon.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/common_sense.jpg
Well I have a family, and I have dogs (big ones) and unless im just going to work I usually necessitate something bigger than a hatchback yaris.
But, clearly this is a never ending battle so I'm just going to say that you guys are right and good luck with saving the plant!
http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q12/jb99ctu/dismissivewank.gif
tuckevalastin
06-08-2009, 05:50 PM
Don't bother with him he's one of the select few here who make this forum unbearable at times.. I mean there is no reason this thread needed to turn into a discussion of enviromentalist ideas except for the fact that some people like to argue about ridiculous garbage instead of discussing the actual topic at hand.
The HX was an awesome idea and I've said many times that it showed GM was moving in the right direction, they just couldn't get past the obsurd reputation that has been given to HUMMER and there is no way a government run GM was going to support it.
BailOut
06-08-2009, 07:11 PM
I mean there is no reason this thread needed to turn into a discussion of enviromentalist ideas except for the fact that some people like to argue about ridiculous garbage instead of discussing the actual topic at hand.
The topic was Saturn and then *cough* someone *cough* brought up Hummer. That was the original derailment, not the anti-Hummer/anti-excess rebuttal.
You have now continued the derailment by hanging on the the HX discussion which has nothing to do with Saturn directly.
So, how about the "topic at hand"?
tuckevalastin
06-08-2009, 07:18 PM
No need to attack what you percieve to be someone's "ideas" even though those ideas were never mentioned in a thread that has nothing to do with those ideas. The original Hummer HX comment was closely related to the thread and didn't intend to start an argument. Some of us enjoy threads that don't deal with fuel efficiency and saving the enviroment because it's our global responsibility and would appreciate it if you didn't force them all to be locked by starting arguments that don't have any place in the thread to begin with.
darthbauer
06-08-2009, 08:26 PM
The topic was Saturn and then *cough* someone *cough* brought up Hummer. That was the original derailment, not the anti-Hummer/anti-excess rebuttal.
You have now continued the derailment by hanging on the the HX discussion which has nothing to do with Saturn directly.
So, how about the "topic at hand"?
You got something in your throat? :thumbdown:
So yeah, on topic. It would be nice if they brought this here.
http://www.renault.com/en/Vehicules/Pages/nouvelle-megane-renault-sport.aspx?initCO2=219
tuckevalastin
06-08-2009, 08:35 PM
Personally I think Saturn would be most competitive in the US market as a Renault-Nissan partner with it's lineup being:
Saturn Kangoo be bop
Saturn Twingo
Saturn Megane
Saturn Clio
Saturn Laguna
http://www.renault.com/en/vehicules/Pages/index.aspx for an idea of what those models look like
darthbauer
06-08-2009, 08:39 PM
+1 on the Laguna, 4wheel steering sounds fun.
HTM Yaris
06-08-2009, 09:17 PM
I was reading today that Penske plans on sourcing parts and labor worldwide with the hope of manufacturing vehicles in the USA at some point in the future . Looks like Penske is going for the jugular .....
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.