![]() |
![]()
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 07 Yaris S Sedan 5-Speed Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,179
|
Cool.
![]() So you really get 60 mpg? Impressive. The reason today's economy car's don't achieve this is because, well, they're bigger. They're heavier, more powerful, ect. They're filled with much more features, safety equipment, ect. This is just what the market demands. The '88 Sprint is basically a metal 3-cylinder shell with wheels. Hence 60 mpg. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2008 Yaris Sedan Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 323
|
60+ mpg at 55 mph.
About 53 mpg at 65 mph. Quote:
The Sprint's driver's seat is significantly more comfortable than my Yaris'. It's a remarkably comfortable 3 cylinder shell with wheels. And I've already run into situations where the Sprint could have easily handled cargo that I had difficulty fitting into the Yaris (Sedan). The Yaris is quieter, however. And has a smoother ride. Definitely a more refined car in many ways. I've driven the Sprint 260,000+ miles and am just as alive as I was when I started. No Accidents. The Yaris has yet to prove itself in that respect. The Sprint affords me pretty much complete visibility in any direction. The Yaris, I'm still getting used to. All its blind spots make me antsy. Although one of my motivations for buying the Yaris was safety, I currently still feel more safe and secure in my Sprint. But that's the sort of thing that needs to be given some more time. -Steve |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2008 Yaris Sedan Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 323
|
Here's the EPA info, BTW. The 1986 model did even better, with a rating of 55 mpg City/60 mpg Hwy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Yaris 3 door Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Boulder Colorado
Posts: 31
|
Looking good PerfectoII!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|