|
12-29-2009, 03:31 AM | #19 |
Drives: car Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: location
Posts: 1,033
|
This is a very very critical issue.
|
12-29-2009, 02:31 PM | #20 |
Keep To The Code
|
Im not one to complain but I think the orange/yellow turn signals are easier to distinguish than the red on red/ shared. Leave it to some person on their cell phone or talking or eating a midnight snack to "not see" your turn signal when it's shared & see where that gets you.
If it comes down to it, we'll all just have to be more careful, or scavenge some orange/yellow Macguyver turn signals. lol
__________________
Completed Mods: Cruise Control, License Plate Mount, Fog Lights, Exhaust Next Mods: Tail Lights, HIDs, Tint, Rear Speaker Box & Amp(Boom Boom :P) |
12-29-2009, 08:00 PM | #21 |
how about giving up your right-of-way...It only causes more confusion!
|
|
12-29-2009, 08:41 PM | #22 |
Drives: Black 5-Spd Sedan S Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 81
|
lol exactly right. And too many people ONLY look straight ahead!
|
12-29-2009, 08:50 PM | #23 |
der Zeck
Drives: '05 Audi A4 1.8t quattro Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 5,231
|
This is the most important thread YW has ever had
__________________
|
12-29-2009, 10:43 PM | #24 |
Drives: . Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: .
Posts: 363
|
I've always hated rear red turn signals. It seems like lazy design to use the same color for both functions, and when braking and turning are very different things there is just no way that they can be statistically just as safe as yellow turn signals. Also, while many rear red turn signals may use different bulbs than the brakes, some do share the bulb, which negates the argument for simply changing the light cover to an aftermarket one in that case.
|
12-29-2009, 11:39 PM | #25 |
vroom vroom
Drives: lil red 5-door Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 7,744
|
I thought red turn signals were something that got phased out years ago for safety concerns... which is why it really confused me when some of the previous-generation mitsubishi lancers were introduced here with red rear turn signals, struck me as very dangerous, the human brain is good at associating colors with meaning... Red = react now!, orange = pay attention. So what's next, traffic lights will have 3 red lights, you gotta pay attention to which one turns on?
Oh and one thing you guys don't have to deal with, a lot of the cool kids here with modded scooters think it's awesome to tint their HEADLIGHTS red...
__________________
The price of freedom of religion, or of speech, or of the press, is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish. - Robert Jackson Bye bye 1NZ... |
12-30-2009, 12:32 AM | #26 |
Keep To The Code
|
wow.. thats really stupid.
__________________
Completed Mods: Cruise Control, License Plate Mount, Fog Lights, Exhaust Next Mods: Tail Lights, HIDs, Tint, Rear Speaker Box & Amp(Boom Boom :P) |
12-30-2009, 02:49 PM | #27 |
Banned
Drives: 2007 4 Door Yaris Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,357
|
exactly... especially since most people drive on "auto pilot" - how many times have you seen someone go at a green that isn't for their lane? Because in their auto pilot brain, green means go.
|
12-31-2009, 11:54 AM | #28 | |
Drives: 2009 Yaris HB RS Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 74
|
Quote:
Regardless, I completely agree with the fact that I would avoid buying cars with red turn signals. I cannot stand them and they are a safety hazard. When I'm passing by someone through their blind spot (this is just an example) I can't see both of their rear lights so I rely on the one closest to me to determine if they are going to make a lane change onto me because they aren't checking their blind spot. But when people brake as if they're braking to a beat, it looks like a turn signal and I slow down to let them make the change only to find out that they were simply braking. Honestly it's kind of funny that you brought this up because I have always fumed about American cars having no yellow turn signals... I really do hope Toyota doesn't cheap out. If not, I'll have to change the lights myself. |
|
12-31-2009, 08:51 PM | #29 |
Super Moderator
Drives: 2014 White VITZ Join Date: May 2007
Location: Huntington Bch, CA
Posts: 4,938
|
Here's a good review of the topic at hand:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turn_signal#Turn_signals Should you not want to read the review, this was copied from it: Turn signal colour Until the early 1960s, most front turn signals worldwide emitted white light and most rear turn signals emitted red. Amber front turn signals were voluntarily adopted by the auto industry in the USA for most vehicles beginning in the 1963 model year, though front turn signals were still permitted to emit white light until FMVSS 108 took effect for the 1968 model year, whereupon amber became the only permissible colour for front turn signals. Presently, almost all countries outside North America require that all front, side and rear turn signals produce amber light. In North America the rear signals may be amber or red. International proponents of amber rear signals say they are more easily discernible as turn signals. U.S. studies in the early 1990s demonstrated improvements in the speed and accuracy of following drivers' reaction to brake lamps when the turn signals were amber rather than red.[36][37][38][39][40] American regulators and other proponents of red rear turn signals have historically asserted there is no proven benefit to amber signals. However, a 2008 U.S. study by NHTSA (the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) suggests vehicles with amber rear signals rather than red ones are up to 28% less likely to be involved in certain kinds of collisions,[41] and a 2009 NHTSA study determined there is a significant overall safety benefit to amber rather than red rear turn signals.[42] There is some evidence that turn signals with colourless clear lenses and amber bulbs may be less conspicuous in bright sunlight than those with amber lenses and colourless bulbs.[43] |
12-31-2009, 09:34 PM | #30 |
Drives: . Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: .
Posts: 363
|
Interesting article, thanks. I think that amber bulbs with colorless lenses (like on the Yaris) is the best way to go.
If cost savings are the supposed reason for making turn signals and brakes the same color, that seems odd given that in Europe, Asia, and Australia amber rear turn signals are required, and most of these cars (especially Hondas and Toyotas) are made for all those markets too. It just seems that making them the same would be simpler and cheaper overall. It's also ironic that North America is the only place that doesn't require amber now, since the center third brake light requirement started in North America and then spread to most of the rest of the world. "In North America since 1986, in Australia and New Zealand since 1990, and in Europe since 1998, a central brake lamp, mounted higher than the vehicle's left and right brake lamps and called a Centre High Mount Stop Lamp (CHMSL), is also required. The CHMSL (pronounced /ˈtʃɪmzəl/) is also sometimes referred to as the centre brake lamp, the third brake light, the eye-level brake lamp, the safety brake lamp, the high-level brake lamp, or the Liddy Light (for Elizabeth Dole, who as U.S. Secretary of Transportation presided over its introduction in the United States[50]). The CHMSL may produce light by means of a single central filament bulb, a row or cluster of filament bulbs or LEDs, or a strip of Neon tube. The CHMSL is intended to provide a deceleration warning to following drivers whose view of the vehicle's left and right stop lamps is blocked by interceding vehicles. It also helps to disambiguate brake vs. turn signal messages in North America, where red rear turn signals identical in appearance to brake lamps are permitted, and also can provide a redundant brake signal in the event of a brake lamp malfunction." |
01-02-2010, 12:37 AM | #31 |
I have to agree that the red turn signal is harder to distinguish from the actual brake light. I do agree with the fact that hardly anyone uses there turn signal anyway(apparently we use telepathy today), which i know so many friends who fail there driving tests cause of this fact. I was behind this mustang whose turn signal, brake and rear light, it was harder to distinguish what the car was going to do, not that to say that I couldnt, but it took longer to. I think its a very dumb idea.
|
|
01-02-2010, 12:49 AM | #32 | |
Drives: '07 Yaris HB Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sudbury, Canada
Posts: 520
|
Quote:
|
|
01-02-2010, 01:05 AM | #33 | |
Quote:
|
||
01-02-2010, 01:39 AM | #34 | |
Quote:
I tried to avoid the ones with red turn signals, especially dealing with So Cal traffic. Then again, So Cal rule of thumb in driving is turn signals are optional... -Richard |
||
01-02-2010, 04:27 AM | #35 |
Drives: 2010 yaris 2 door red Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 25
|
sadly that is true here... very few cars even use turn signals... even a few big rigs dont use them... that woke me up on the freeway... but yea i do like the yellow turn lights better then the red... it doesnt take that important few seconds to figure out whats going on in front of u
|
01-07-2010, 02:09 PM | #36 | |
Drives: . Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: .
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NEWS: TOYOTA REVEALS ALL-NEW YARIS SEDAN AT 2006 LOS ANGELES AUTO SHOW | VitzBoy | General Yaris / Vitz Discussion | 7 | 09-20-2023 07:50 AM |
When will the Yaris hit the showrooms at dealers? | Petrolhead | New YARIS Purchase Forum | 181 | 11-28-2011 07:03 AM |
Ultra Racing 23mm Rear Stabilizer Bar | Loren | Performance Modifications | 62 | 05-18-2009 07:20 PM |
Dealer: Disabling the seat belt chime is now illegal? | schleppy | Cosmetic Modifications (Exterior/Interior) | 13 | 04-18-2009 04:43 PM |