Quote:
Originally Posted by Crims0n5
We'll you are right when you say that man is not the "cause" of global warming. However, I haven't heard any credible source blaming man for global warming. It is a natural cycle that has been occurring. The real argument is whether our actions are bringing on Global Climate Change at rather accelerated rate.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PK198105
ok oil is not limitless, you cant have something out of thin air. Oil is basically petrified/fermented/decomposed/liquefied/compressed/etc biological matter (i.e dinos, plants, etc) and it takes ages (thousands if not million of years) to produce, there is no magic tap that constantly pours out crude (no gulf jokes please  ), so yes we will eventually run out of it, quicker than it takes for it to replenish. The point is, no one knows for sure when will this happen and the people that say it will be within the next 50 years are the sly devils that own the wells creating a justification for filling their pockets with your cash. It's like asking a fox to guard the hen (no sh%^ they will say "sure sure I'll be honest about it and tell you the truth"). What is needed is an independent, honest and unbiased person or group to verify the claims on both sides.As for global warming even the scientists are divided because they simply cant predict, they can study models and make educated guesses but it's all it is an educated guess. So both sides of this argument are correct and wrong at the same time unless there is scientific (repeatable and measurable) and unbiased proof
|
No you're wrong... People believed the earth was flat once too. They were wrong. There is more than enough limestone for millions years of petroleum production by an for us by our mother earth. Maybe by then we'll have access to the better solutions.
Science will always be politicized. Heck Galileo was thown in a dungeon for saying the evidence suggest that the Sun is the center of the Universe. There was very little funding for climate research until the APW scam was seized apon... those scientists are not going report the truth.. they're going to "hide the decline" and punish dissent... they've got carreers to build mouths to feed and cars and homes to buy. They know if they don't produce the results their funder's want some one else will. But there are more than 30,000 honest scientists who are screaming at the top of their lungs that is all a bunch of Hogwash this global warming scam... Do they get to be heard? No of course not because that doesn't support the agenda. If you think dissent is not silenced in scientific research or any politics for that matter you're not one. Scientists cling tightly to the accepted dogmas and Politicians out CIA agents to circle the wagons around the propaganda machine.