Jason Bourne movie

[static808]

first one was ridiculously good, but the second one, in my opinion, sucked donkey balls. they changed directors from the first to second, and it showed in the cinematography BIG time. the action scenes in part 1 were crisp and shot from a distance where you could see every minute detail. the 2nd one's action scenes were shot as if you were actually right there in the scuffle...all close and too damn shaky. i could barely tell whether they were going hand to hand or using weapons. its a shame, since the plot and acting in the 2nd one was good. so i guess my question for those who saw the 3rd one is whether the cinematography was similar to the 2nd movie, where it looked like some dude with a cameraphone was following the actors, kinda like the blair witch project?? cuz if it is, i doubt me and the wifey will see it... which sucks since part 1 is one of our favorite all-time movies!

--B