Straight through..?

[at3GG]

I dont know...why do we spend $200 on an intake for a 90whp car? Because we want to. I would be keeping the original(and seperate, 2nd) midpipe for all practical purposes. . I asked if it would be worth it to do it performance wise. Thats all.

P.S Nexus-you show that tree whos boss

[richardholdener]

You guys need to take a look at the long-tube header dyno results. It wasn't posted correctly,but the middle of the three runs is what happened when we removed the entire exhaust system aft of the stock exhaust manifold. At wide open throttle, there was NO loss in power anywhere by removing all of the exhaust, so this theory that there is a loss with minor adjustments to the mid pipe are not acurate. Every change we have made to the exhaust to improve flow has been positive (though not huge gains until we installed the long-tub header.)

Originally Posted by at3GG

I dont know...why do we spend $200 on an intake for a 90whp car? Because we want to. I would be keeping the original(and seperate, 2nd) midpipe for all practical purposes. . I asked if it would be worth it to do it performance wise. Thats all.

P.S Nexus-you show that tree whos boss

[Malaya1221]

Originally Posted by at3GG

I dont know...why do we spend $200 on an intake for a 90whp car? Because we want to. I would be keeping the original(and seperate, 2nd) midpipe for all practical purposes. . I asked if it would be worth it to do it performance wise. Thats all.

P.S Nexus-you show that tree whos boss

IMO, it's worth it! still have the nitto mid pipe (w/o cat just 2 resonators) just don't do a non muffler exhaust because in my experience the droning is unbearable!