Man Avoids 37 Speed Camera Tickets By Wearing Monkey Mask

[ozmdd]

You are only responsible for damages if you were negligent in lending the vehicle. That is tricky to define, because its subjective, but it basically means that if you had reasonable cause to suspect the person was going to do something dangerous/foolish, you can be held liable. For example: if you lend your vehicle to someone whose license is suspended and you didn't ask them if they had a valid license, you might be held responsible. If you asked them and they lied to you so you lent it in "good faith," you are probably in the clear.
The owner of the vehicle IS responsible in most civil situations, like red light cameras and toll roads.

[kustom play]

Originally Posted by ozmdd

You are only responsible for damages if you were negligent in lending the vehicle. That is tricky to define, because its subjective, but it basically means that if you had reasonable cause to suspect the person was going to do something dangerous/foolish, you can be held liable. For example: if you lend your vehicle to someone whose license is suspended and you didn't ask them if they had a valid license, you might be held responsible. If you asked them and they lied to you so you lent it in "good faith," you are probably in the clear.
The owner of the vehicle IS responsible in most civil situations, like red light cameras and toll roads.

not true as well

this is the reason why they are having issues, trust me on this, I can show you the letters of violation and ive been in the insurance business for quite some time

the state HAS TO PROVE THE DRIVER NOT THE CAR. thats why this guy is getting let off. I take it you dont have photo radar in your state lol

try looking it up online, also check out places like www.camerafraud.com

a lot of good info