A car of interest....

[jayeh]

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

I would guess tooter means re the types of things the government is choosing to spend money on (ObamaCare, for example), rather than the structure of the government. Although, with the POTUS disregarding the separation of powers set forth in our constitution, and our congress failing to impeach and try him for this, some might feel that it is debatable what form of government we have (effectively) in the United States.

I'll never understand the way people fight against healthcare. I though I do understand ever so slightly more than the average canadian and I've explained to lots of my friends that people are against it because it'll screw up/shut down lots of small businesses, and people could see jobs cut or wages cut to pay for the new coverage.

I'm always fascinated by american politics. The thing that gets me is that lots of our government services here (the postal system, national parks, provincial parks, national museums etc) are run as for profit businesses whereas the USA subsidizes these things.

Originally Posted by bentjazz

"The Real Lincoln" by Loyola Economics Professor Thomas DiLorenzo. Lincoln was a dictator, racist, and sophist extraordinaire. We should tear down the Lincoln Memorial. Lincoln was a fraud and those belonging to the Cult of Lincoln are liars....

That is one of the reasons why Lincoln should not be touted as much as he was. He did some purely evil things, and got amazingly lucky in winning the civil war.

[/QUOTE]
That sounds like an interesting read.

[nookandcrannycar]

Originally Posted by jayeh

I'll never understand the way people fight against healthcare. I though I do understand ever so slightly more than the average canadian and I've explained to lots of my friends that people are against it because it'll screw up/shut down lots of small businesses, and people could see jobs cut or wages cut to pay for the new coverage.

Many of us who don't want it do not feel that way because we want to 'fight against healthcare'. We feel the way we do because what Obama CLAIMED was the impetus for healthcare reform (getting more people covered) could have been accomplished by expanding current programs (such as Medicaid, or even giving everyone the choice US Federal Employees have). After Obama took office (and the debate was renewed) several congressmen (on different committees) proposed giving the public the same insurance options that US Federal Employees have. Not one of these proposals even got out of committee. I think most people in the U.S. would have liked to see a solution that covered more people, but not ObamaCare - a top down solution that changes almost everything. Also, we don't like being lied to...and this whole process has been frought with lies coming (mainly) from Obama (you can keep the coverage you have...you can keep the doctor you have....premiums will decrease an average of $2500 per year for a family...and on and on (the list of lies is as long as both of my arms). If ObamaCare is so great, then why are any exemptions needed?....and... When was the last time you heard White House Press Secretary Jay Carney answer a question directly or really even at all? I don't think I ever have. IMO, he tries to obfuscate nearly everything.

[tooter]

tooter wrote:
And you're right, because the US has adopted the European model of government.

Originally Posted by jayeh

In what way?????!!!!????

America has adopted the European model of a taxing regulating litigating cradle-to-grave benefits dispensing liberal socialist bureaucratic welfare state...

...and only because that is what the political majority have demanded it to be.

[nookandcrannycar]

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

Many of us who don't want it do not feel that way because we want to 'fight against healthcare'. We feel the way we do because what Obama CLAIMED was the impetus for healthcare reform (getting more people covered) could have been accomplished by expanding current programs (such as Medicaid, or even giving everyone the choice US Federal Employees have). After Obama took office (and the debate was renewed) several congressmen (on different committees) proposed giving the public the same insurance options that US Federal Employees have. Not one of these proposals even got out of committee. I think most people in the U.S. would have liked to see a solution that covered more people, but not ObamaCare - a top down solution that changes almost everything. Also, we don't like being lied to...and this whole process has been frought with lies coming (mainly) from Obama (you can keep the coverage you have...you can keep the doctor you have....premiums will decrease an average of $2500 per year for a family...and on and on (the list of lies is as long as both of my arms). If ObamaCare is so great, then why are any exemptions needed?....and... When was the last time you heard White House Press Secretary Jay Carney answer a question directly or really even at all? I don't think I ever have. IMO, he tries to obfuscate nearly everything.

Another reason I feel this way is that I feel betrayed. I was at a family dinner after Obama secured the nomination in 2008. One of my relatives has good friends who are good friends of Hillary's and this relative is a big Hillary supporter (she drives her dad crazy as he is to the right of Attila the Hun). I argued that Obama was the proper choice. Now my favorite point in his presidency is when he had to sit there and listen to Dr. Benjamin Carson (go Dr. Carson) at the Prayer Breakfast. While sitting there, Obama looked as if he had just swallowed a POS.

[nookandcrannycar]

Originally Posted by tooter

America has adopted the European model of a taxing regulating litigating cradle-to-grave benefits dispensing liberal socialist bureaucratic welfare state...

...and only because that is what the political majority have demanded it to be.

...and we are going in the wrong direction while some other countries are going in the right direction. The U.S. has the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. Russia abolished its inheritance tax. Russia has a VAT, but they have a flat personal income tax rate of 13 percent and a tax on dividends of only 9 percent (just a few examples of different, better policies that the U.S. could adopt). People are rightly praising Lady Thatcher today while noting her passing. The U.S. needs a 'kick in the pants' akin to what she gave the UK when she became Prime Minister.

[jayeh]

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

Many of us who don't want it do not feel that way because we want to 'fight against healthcare'. We feel the way we do because what Obama CLAIMED was the impetus for healthcare reform (getting more people covered) could have been accomplished by expanding current programs (such as Medicaid, or even giving everyone the choice US Federal Employees have). After Obama took office (and the debate was renewed) several congressmen (on different committees) proposed giving the public the same insurance options that US Federal Employees have. Not one of these proposals even got out of committee. I think most people in the U.S. would have liked to see a solution that covered more people, but not ObamaCare - a top down solution that changes almost everything. Also, we don't like being lied to...and this whole process has been frought with lies coming (mainly) from Obama (you can keep the coverage you have...you can keep the doctor you have....premiums will decrease an average of $2500 per year for a family...and on and on (the list of lies is as long as both of my arms). If ObamaCare is so great, then why are any exemptions needed?....and... When was the last time you heard White House Press Secretary Jay Carney answer a question directly or really even at all? I don't think I ever have. IMO, he tries to obfuscate nearly everything.

I just don't get it! I don't even agree with the concept of for profit healthcare.

Originally Posted by tooter

America has adopted the European model of a taxing regulating litigating cradle-to-grave benefits dispensing liberal socialist bureaucratic welfare state...

...and only because that is what the political majority have demanded it to be.

I don't understand how anyone could think the united states is anywhere close to that!

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

...and we are going in the wrong direction while some other countries are going in the right direction. The U.S. has the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. Russia abolished its inheritance tax. Russia has a VAT, but they have a flat personal income tax rate of 13 percent and a tax on dividends of only 9 percent (just a few examples of different, better policies that the U.S. could adopt). People are rightly praising Lady Thatcher today while noting her passing. The U.S. needs a 'kick in the pants' akin to what she gave the UK when she became Prime Minister.

You might want to check your sources on that statement about the corporate taxes.

I guess I'm just a socialist at heart!

[tooter]

Originally Posted by jayeh

I don't understand how anyone could think the united states is anywhere close to that!

Oh really?

47,000,000 people are on government food stamps.

1 out of every 4 children eat government food in a government school.

The majority in America have created the government they deserve in their own image.

I guess I'm just a socialist at heart!

Exactly.

[jayeh]

Originally Posted by tooter

Oh really?

47,000,000 people are on government food stamps.

1 out of every 4 children eat government food in a government school.

The majority in America have created the government they deserve in their own image.

That is proof enough for me that something is wrong with the system!

[tooter]

Originally Posted by jayeh

That is proof enough for me that something is wrong with the system!

There's actually nothing wrong with the system itself...

...for the system is nothing more or less than what the popular collective societal consensus demands it to be. It is a direct expression of the values (or lack of them) by which people live their own lives. the government is created in the image of those who demand it to serve them at the expense of others. So it's people who determine the size and nature of the government they deserve... and not the other way around.

People who love lies will always elect liars who will lie to them.

[nookandcrannycar]

Originally Posted by jayeh

I just don't get it! I don't even agree with the concept of for profit healthcare.

So it's okay that Obama lied to us because we know his goal is a single payer system . Not that this would be true of any of my neighbors, but if my neighbor down the street is the same age and also doesn't smoke, but weighs 500 pounds and drinks a bottle of vodka a day (I don't drink and am not obese), why should we pay the same for health insurance? ObamaCare only allows physical location, age, and smoker vs non-smoker to be taken into consideration re insurance rates.

I don't understand how anyone could think the united states is anywhere close to that!

Our national debt is already a fair amount higher per capita than Greece. Some people think that doesn't matter because of the different nature of our economy. I still think it matters. Some people think that conservatives in the U.S. are selfish because we want to cut government spending and we don't want to pay higher taxes. I say what could possibly be more selfish than to borrow money for excessive things that are desired (but not needed) now (what many liberals want) and make kids, grandkids, great grandkids, great great grandkids, etc. (who have no say in the matter) pay that money back.

You might want to check your sources on that statement about the corporate taxes.

In late March of 2012 the corporate tax rate in Japan dipped just below ours, giving the U.S. the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. Liberals here will say that is a conservative talking point and is inaccurate because the U.S. has the second lowest corporate tax rate among such countries when expressed as a percentage of GDP. IMO, that is liberal drivel. Talk to the CEO of a company headquartered outside the U.S. who is thinking about relocating his company from its current location. He's not going to care what the U.S. corporate tax rate is as a percentagle of GDP. He's going to care what his company would have to pay.

I guess I'm just a socialist at heart!

I guess so .

[jayeh]

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

So it's okay that Obama lied to us because we know his goal is a single payer system . Not that this would be true of any of my neighbors, but if my neighbor down the street is the same age and also doesn't smoke, but weighs 500 pounds and drinks a bottle of vodka a day (I don't drink and am not obese), why should we pay the same for health insurance? ObamaCare only allows physical location, age, and smoker vs non-smoker to be taken into consideration re insurance rates.

I don't know the answer to that, but here alcohol and cigarettes are taxed to the sky so it kind of evens out.

I'm also shocked by how much people pay for health insurance in the first place. I was reading that somebody my age would pay about what I pay in a year for income tax for their health insurance alone, plus about the same amount of income tax!

I'm fascinated by the social programs in the US. They seem to be somewhat jumbled and inefficient and with a great variance by state.

[nookandcrannycar]

Originally Posted by jayeh

I don't know the answer to that, but here alcohol and cigarettes are taxed to the sky so it kind of evens out.

I'm also shocked by how much people pay for health insurance in the first place. I was reading that somebody my age would pay about what I pay in a year for income tax for their health insurance alone, plus about the same amount of income tax!

I'm fascinated by the social programs in the US. They seem to be somewhat jumbled and inefficient and with a great variance by state.

The difference between states fascinates me. I was getting gas for my Yaris in East Brunswick, New Jersey in 2010 and I asked the attendant why gas is so much cheaper in New Jersey than in New York or Connecticut. He said it is because the gas tax is so much lower and New Jersey makes up for it by having higher cigarette and alcohol taxes than New York and Connecticut. I like the approach New Jersey takes on this because most people have to buy gas, but people don't have to smoke or drink. I just wish the State of New Jersey would let people pump their own gas!

California has been notorious in the past for providing generous social benefits, with some cities going beyond that and providing even more assistance. As a result (at least partially) California has nearly 1/3 of all welfare recipients in the U.S. while having about 1/8 of the population.

A few months ago I was walking into an older Kroger supermarket in Humble, TX (a city that is south of me (in Harris County) and also east of me. This particular Kroger is near a lot of apartments. I noticed what was essentially a government ad promoting food stamps with an eligible income re size of household grid . This same 'promotion' is NOT on the door of my local Kroger (I think because the median income in my area is too high), but I did notice that 'Obamaphones' are available at my local Kroger .

I've also been told there are ads currently running in Mexico instructing people how to get food stamps in the U.S. once they get across the border. Why are government workers doing this (and squandering taxpayer money in the process), and why is it the policy coming from above? Because the more people there are enrolled in the program, the more government workers are needed and both of these groups can, *BINGO*, be relied upon to vote for Democrats....and many people believe that this last reason is why the administration has taken the stances it has in various situations re immigration. I think people seeking out the Food Stamp benefit and getting it if they qualify is one thing, but I think initiating/promoting more (some of it BORROWED) money that the taxpayers are on the hook for is despicable. If a certain amount is 'budgeted' and the managers feel or require that that all has to be distributed, then that process needs to be revised.

[nookandcrannycar]

Originally Posted by tooter

There's actually nothing wrong with the system itself...

...for the system is nothing more or less than what the popular collective societal consensus demands it to be. It is a direct expression of the values (or lack of them) by which people live their own lives. the government is created in the image of those who demand it to serve them at the expense of others. So it's people who determine the size and nature of the government they deserve... and not the other way around.

People who love lies will always elect liars who will lie to them.

And elected again! Even given the huge Democratic tilt in California, I was a bit aghast that Moonbeam got elected again.

[STC]

Wow. Thread has gone political.

Speaking on terms of the Yaris. Here in State College, PA I see a good number of Yari. From family, couples, and Penn State University students. I'm glad to see that us Americans are catching on the efficient mode of transportation by driving the Yaris. Heck, you don't even need to by a media sponsored "green car" like the Prius to gain great gas mileage and lower your carbon print. Plus, you can buy the Yaris at half the cost! Who is intelligent now?

US Government is retrograde, IMHO. We live in a false Left/Right political paradigm. There is no such thing as a political dichotomy. It is all false. Why in the last several years have followed the non-aggression principle of Voluntaryism. My philosophy is best described by: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muHg86Mys7I

Cheers!

[tooter]

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

California has been notorious in the past for providing generous social benefits, with some cities going beyond that and providing even more assistance. As a result (at least partially) California has nearly 1/3 of all welfare recipients in the U.S. while having about 1/8 of the population.

A few months ago I was walking into an older Kroger supermarket in Humble, TX (a city that is south of me (in Harris County) and also east of me. This particular Kroger is near a lot of apartments. I noticed what was essentially a government ad promoting food stamps with an eligible income re size of household grid . This same 'promotion' is NOT on the door of my local Kroger (I think because the median income in my area is too high), but I did notice that 'Obamaphones' are available at my local Kroger .

I've also been told there are ads currently running in Mexico instructing people how to get food stamps in the U.S. once they get across the border. Why are government workers doing this (and squandering taxpayer money in the process), and why is it the policy coming from above? Because the more people there are enrolled in the program, the more government workers are needed and both of these groups can, *BINGO*, be relied upon to vote for Democrats....and many people believe that this last reason is why the administration has taken the stances it has in various situations re immigration. I think people seeking out the Food Stamp benefit and getting it if they qualify is one thing, but I think initiating/promoting more (some of it BORROWED) money that the taxpayers are on the hook for is despicable. If a certain amount is 'budgeted' and the managers feel or require that that all has to be distributed, then that process needs to be revised.

You're quite correct, nook...
The California State government uses taxpayer money to pay for radio advertising campaigns promoting its food stamp program SNAP, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program.

Since June 2009, 1,300,000 more people have filed for disability benefits which has become the new welfare.

Last month, while 87,000 new jobs were created, 496,000 people had left the work force. So 6 times more people left the work force as reentered it.

The percentage of working-age adults in the labor force, the participation rate, fell to 63.3 percent last month, breaking the record low set in May 1979 which was the last major recession 34 years ago.

[tooter]

Originally Posted by STC

Wow. Thread has gone political.

Gotta have at least one thread in every forum.

[why?]

We're in a depression, the politicians and their media backers just refuse to use the word. 90 million healthy Americans can't find a job, 8.8 million Americans are on disability, the same number of Americans went on disability last month as found a job(88,000.) You won't find numbers bigger than those during any part of the 70's, or at any time during the great depression.

Originally Posted by jayeh

I never said it wasn't My point was people here don't think small cars are suitable for families.

I often see the opposite. People who drive a lot will buy a bigger car. If I still had to commute from way outside the city I'd just get a bigger car with a 5 or 6 speed AT. Most new cars will get better fuel economy than a Yaris at highway speed.

Thats about the way I feel about the USA.

That would be great if you only drove your car around your own property, but you don't.

So what you are saying is you don't drive much, you don't commute, but you think you'd see the cars commuters drive? Wait what? That does not commute. I have commuted, several times, smaller vehicles were the norm.

Originally Posted by tooter

And you're right, because the US has adopted the European model of government.

Sadly, even though it is 100% Unconstitutional for us to do so.

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

:c lap:

A little stronger than I would have put it, but .

But true. The Civil War should have ended in a week. The entire Southern army was a day away from DC, with zero troops between them and the President. Only an act of cowardice kept them from storming the capital and winning the war outright.

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

I sometimes get that vibe when I go to places in the Houston metro that are more 'Texas-centric' (which, among other things = more pickups and more large SUVs....as opposed to near my area 58 percent of the people were born outside of Texas)

I' don't. Everyone understands when I talk gas mileage. I still have people ask me about that. And the National Association for Gun Rights sticker on my hatch lets them know all they need to about my politics.

Originally Posted by bentjazz

"The Real Lincoln" by Loyola Economics Professor Thomas DiLorenzo. Lincoln was a dictator, racist, and sophist extraordinaire. We should tear down the Lincoln Memorial. Lincoln was a fraud and those belonging to the Cult of Lincoln are liars....
That is one of the reasons why Lincoln should not be touted as much as he was. He did some purely evil things, and got amazingly lucky in winning the civil war.

[/QUOTE]

Now that is stronger than I might put it. And yet, I'll have to check out that book, but I have a strong bias against academics, for obvious reasons.

Originally Posted by jayeh

I'll never understand the way people fight against healthcare. I though I do understand ever so slightly more than the average canadian and I've explained to lots of my friends that people are against it because it'll screw up/shut down lots of small businesses, and people could see jobs cut or wages cut to pay for the new coverage.
I'm always fascinated by american politics. The thing that gets me is that lots of our government services here (the postal system, national parks, provincial parks, national museums etc) are run as for profit businesses whereas the USA subsidizes these things.

Show me a government healthcare scheme that is working. Every single one is failing, and innocent people are dying, because someone was too greedy and self centered to let freedom ring.

Originally Posted by tooter

America has adopted the European model of a taxing regulating litigating cradle-to-grave benefits dispensing liberal socialist bureaucratic welfare state...

...and only because that is what the political majority have demanded it to be.

Not the political majority, but the majority of people who choose to pay attention. We would not be anywhere near what we are if so many people chose to ignore politics completely for so long.

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

Another reason I feel this way is that I feel betrayed. I was at a family dinner after Obama secured the nomination in 2008. One of my relatives has good friends who are good friends of Hillary's and this relative is a big Hillary supporter (she drives her dad crazy as he is to the right of Attila the Hun). I argued that Obama was the proper choice. Now my favorite point in his presidency is when he had to sit there and listen to Dr. Benjamin Carson (go Dr. Carson) at the Prayer Breakfast. While sitting there, Obama looked as if he had just swallowed a POS.

I can't believe you would ever think that. How does hanging out with a terrorist make someone worthy of being the president? How does never earning an honest days work make someone worthy of being the president? A perusal of his books would let anyone understand how wrong he was for this job, and exactly what he would do if he ever found his way into it.

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

...and we are going in the wrong direction while some other countries are going in the right direction. The U.S. has the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. Russia abolished its inheritance tax. Russia has a VAT, but they have a flat personal income tax rate of 13 percent and a tax on dividends of only 9 percent (just a few examples of different, better policies that the U.S. could adopt). People are rightly praising Lady Thatcher today while noting her passing. The U.S. needs a 'kick in the pants' akin to what she gave the UK when she became Prime Minister.

Many countries have ditched a communist income tax scheme for flat taxes. Every single one of them is doing better now. Our system is not about getting money for the government, it is all about control.

Originally Posted by jayeh

I just don't get it! I don't even agree with the concept of for profit healthcare.
I don't understand how anyone could think the united states is anywhere close to that!
You might want to check your sources on that statement about the corporate taxes.
I guess I'm just a socialist at heart!

Notice how the wealthiest always flock to the US for health care? Notice how the newest and best treatments come from the US? For profit means the best of the best will do it, because they will be rewarded for their hard work. Government health care means people will die for no reason, means anyone who can will not only pay for government health care, but will also have to purchase "supplemental" health care aka private health care, so they don't die from something simple because the wait line is a year long. Every single government health care scheme is failing, and in all those countries purchase of private health care is rising dramatically. Gee, I wonder why...

Originally Posted by tooter

Oh really?
47,000,000 people are on government food stamps.
1 out of every 4 children eat government food in a government school.
The majority in America have created the government they deserve in their own image.
Exactly.

Not the majority, but only the evil control mongers that paid attention, and paid people to vote. If everyone paid attention and voted for the past 100 years, we would not have this problem.

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

So it's okay that Obama lied to us because we know his goal is a single payer system . Not that this would be true of any of my neighbors, but if my neighbor down the street is the same age and also doesn't smoke, but weighs 500 pounds and drinks a bottle of vodka a day (I don't drink and am not obese), why should we pay the same for health insurance? ObamaCare only allows physical location, age, and smoker vs non-smoker to be taken into consideration re insurance rates.
Our national debt is already a fair amount higher per capita than Greece. Some people think that doesn't matter because of the different nature of our economy. I still think it matters. Some people think that conservatives in the U.S. are selfish because we want to cut government spending and we don't want to pay higher taxes. I say what could possibly be more selfish than to borrow money for excessive things that are desired (but not needed) now (what many liberals want) and make kids, grandkids, great grandkids, great great grandkids, etc. (who have no say in the matter) pay that money back.




In late March of 2012 the corporate tax rate in Japan dipped just below ours, giving the U.S. the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. Liberals here will say that is a conservative talking point and is inaccurate because the U.S. has the second lowest corporate tax rate among such countries when expressed as a percentage of GDP. IMO, that is liberal drivel. Talk to the CEO of a company headquartered outside the U.S. who is thinking about relocating his company from its current location. He's not going to care what the U.S. corporate tax rate is as a percentagle of GDP. He's going to care what his company would have to pay.



I guess so .

Obama was trained at muslim schools, which teach that lying to a non muslim is a great thing if it means you will gain power over them.

It always amazes me that people don't get that we started having problems with health care when governments started telling insurance companies what they could and could not do. Before that, health care was wonderful and cheap. Just ask your grandparents. The government never makes anything better, only worse.

Our naitional debt is absurd, and if you believe some people, could be well over $100 trillion in real money. Rumors are at least 4 full books are kept, if not more others don't know about. And It could also be a gigantic lie to gain power over us as well. The people in charge want us in chains, and will do anything to get us there. If you look, people linked to Alinsky are in a ton of really powerful positions the world over. That is neither good, nor a coincidence.

Originally Posted by jayeh

I don't know the answer to that, but here alcohol and cigarettes are taxed to the sky so it kind of evens out.
I'm also shocked by how much people pay for health insurance in the first place. I was reading that somebody my age would pay about what I pay in a year for income tax for their health insurance alone, plus about the same amount of income tax!
I'm fascinated by the social programs in the US. They seem to be somewhat jumbled and inefficient and with a great variance by state.

They are pathetic, and don't do anything but destroy people, families, and waste money. I believe though that is their entire purpose to begin with. No one is this stupid. Just this evil.

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

The difference between states fascinates me. I was getting gas for my Yaris in East Brunswick, New Jersey in 2010 and I asked the attendant why gas is so much cheaper in New Jersey than in New York or Connecticut. He said it is because the gas tax is so much lower and New Jersey makes up for it by having higher cigarette and alcohol taxes than New York and Connecticut. I like the approach New Jersey takes on this because most people have to buy gas, but people don't have to smoke or drink. I just wish the State of New Jersey would let people pump their own gas!

California has been notorious in the past for providing generous social benefits, with some cities going beyond that and providing even more assistance. As a result (at least partially) California has nearly 1/3 of all welfare recipients in the U.S. while having about 1/8 of the population.

A few months ago I was walking into an older Kroger supermarket in Humble, TX (a city that is south of me (in Harris County) and also east of me. This particular Kroger is near a lot of apartments. I noticed what was essentially a government ad promoting food stamps with an eligible income re size of household grid . This same 'promotion' is NOT on the door of my local Kroger (I think because the median income in my area is too high), but I did notice that 'Obamaphones' are available at my local Kroger .

I've also been told there are ads currently running in Mexico instructing people how to get food stamps in the U.S. once they get across the border. Why are government workers doing this (and squandering taxpayer money in the process), and why is it the policy coming from above? Because the more people there are enrolled in the program, the more government workers are needed and both of these groups can, *BINGO*, be relied upon to vote for Democrats....and many people believe that this last reason is why the administration has taken the stances it has in various situations re immigration. I think people seeking out the Food Stamp benefit and getting it if they qualify is one thing, but I think initiating/promoting more (some of it BORROWED) money that the taxpayers are on the hook for is despicable. If a certain amount is 'budgeted' and the managers feel or require that that all has to be distributed, then that process needs to be revised.

States should be different, that was the original point. A federal government to make the states get a long, print a common currency, and murder enemies, and make sure the government doesn't round up and kill its own civilians. State governments for everything else. It worked perfectly for 100 years. Then someone thought it was a good idea to let a clueless professor become president, and it has all been downhill since. Ok, so clueless professor is an oxymoron, I do know that.

Originally Posted by tooter

You're quite correct, nook...
The California State government uses taxpayer money to pay for radio advertising campaigns promoting its food stamp program SNAP, Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program.

Since June 2009, 1,300,000 more people have filed for disability benefits which has become the new welfare.

Last month, while 87,000 new jobs were created, 496,000 people had left the work force. So 6 times more people left the work force as reentered it.

The percentage of working-age adults in the labor force, the participation rate, fell to 63.3 percent last month, breaking the record low set in May 1979 which was the last major recession 34 years ago.

California is beyond bankrupt. We should let them fail, and let their people starve. They of course will do the smart thing and leave.

Oh, and when you are on unemployment, the government officials will tell you to go on disability when it runs out. How insane is that? Not take a job at McDonalds, but go fake a disability. How sick is this country?

[STC]

Originally Posted by tooter

Gotta have at least one thread in every forum.

LOL!