|
08-22-2012, 10:14 PM | #1 |
I've made a post!
Drives: 2012 Yaris L 3 door liftback Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1
|
Existing stock tires on a wider rim, any Fuel Efficiency cons?
Im looking to buy a lighter wheel for my 2012 Yaris, it comes stock with 15" steel rims that are 5.5" in width and Bridgestone Turanzas (P175/65R15 84H) on them. I'm looking at the Konig Zero 15" aluminum rim Z156T04385 that is 6.5" in width. Can I use the Bridgestones on the Konigs even though the rims are 1" wider? If the tire fits on the rim and works properly, are there any FE disadvantages to the wider rim and same tire?
Any info appreciated, thanks |
08-22-2012, 11:45 PM | #2 |
Drives: '14 GT86, '08 Vitz Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 9,873
|
I don't see any problems with that, it's a big enough profile that it shouldn't even stretch. I don't think you'll see any disadvantages since they will be lighter rims. You'll probably actually pick up a few more mpg's.
|
08-22-2012, 11:49 PM | #3 |
Drives: 07 Yaris sedan Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Keremeos BC
Posts: 986
|
Gee, we used to play this game decades ago, not for FE, but for steering accuracy. It changes the sidewall angle, and for that purpose, it worked fine. More air pressure was needed in order to keep the sidewall aligned with the tread.
This all sounds like rubbish nowadays, but it worked then... |
09-06-2012, 12:47 AM | #4 |
Drives: 2010 Yaris S HB Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 33
|
I understand you can't get the Konigs in 5.5 inch width, correct?
It would be more beneficial in theory to have the narrower wheels, as they would be lighter (by the weight of approximately 10 or 11 cubic inches of aluminum alloy, fudging and estimating the measurements). Will you notice the difference in real life? No; it's minute (even though the theoretical 'effective' weight would be greater than the actual weight- rotational unsprung mass has a greater effect on vehicle performance and efficiency than static sprung weight). Also, the narrower wheels would be more aerodynamic. While the wider wheels might offer a lower coefficient of drag, they also present more frontal area to the wind, for a probable net increase in drag. On the other hand, considering the last post, your tires may last longer at the higher tire pressures that are desirable for fuel economy, and your steering feel/ response may improve, even if there is no increase in maximum mechanical grip. All that being said, the weight savings of the aluminum wheel over the steel wheel will probably make more of a difference than all that stuff I just wrote, and we're splitting hairs talking about the fuel economy difference between a 5.5 inch- and 6.5 inch-wide wheel with the same size tire mounted on them. Basically, if that's the narrowest size offered for that wheel, and you like the style of the wheel, I'd say go for it. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
tire noob question..what's the widest tire size can run on stock 15"s? | detroiter | Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack | 22 | 12-06-2011 09:44 AM |
2012 Camry | Kal-El | Off-topic / Other Cars / Everything else Discussions | 26 | 10-02-2011 09:20 PM |
205/55/15 Tires and Fuel Efficiency | landrym28 | Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack | 7 | 05-23-2011 02:29 PM |
My review of hankook tires 205/55/15 on stock rims | YarisSedan | Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack | 0 | 09-30-2009 01:01 AM |
FS Brand New Stock rims w/ Tires | FlintS | Items for Sale by private party | 10 | 09-24-2007 08:22 PM |