Toyota Yaris Forums - Ultimate Yaris Enthusiast Site
 

 


 
Go Back   Toyota Yaris Forums - Ultimate Yaris Enthusiast Site > Technical Forums > Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack
 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-11-2007, 08:10 PM   #37
cleong
Parallel Parking Pro
 
cleong's Avatar
 
Drives: Yaris 1.5 Manual
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 590
I did some Googlesearching and came out more or less with the ratio of 1:4 (ie 1lb rim weight lost is as good as 4lbs static weight).

It is a best-fit rule of thumb that some people use to simplify the performance advantage of lighter cars.
__________________
Leong's NCP91 Toyota Yaris E
Hankook V12 Evo 195/55/15 on Buddy Club P1 replicas 15x7 ET +38
Stebel horns, Philips Silvervision turn indicator bulbs
TTE Lowering Springs, Camber bolts
TRD Blue brake pads
Fujitsubo Super Wagolis axleback exhaust
DC Sports header
cleong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 09:12 AM   #38
kurokoma-kun
 
Drives: 2007 Yaris HB
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: my own little world
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by eTiMaGo View Post
I find it easier to explain these phenomena with basic everyday examples...Anyway, I hope that helped, for the less technically-minded out there
eTiMaGo, you are my hero Your point about the weight balance is, I think, what I was asking about originally. Lowering the center of gravity is next step for me.

I don't mind admitting that once you start getting into differential equations and so forth I am completely lost. This is why I was not able to pursue a career in science, because at some point, interactions get so complex they can only be explained mathematically, and I have no intuitive understanding of it.
__________________
my yaris, kurokoma-kun
kurokoma-kun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 11:49 AM   #39
elsteverino889
 
elsteverino889's Avatar
 
Drives: 2007 Yaris sedan black
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MIA!
Posts: 354
According to http://www.wheelweights.net/ our stock wheels are 16.0 lbs which isnt bad already lets say u get 11 lb wheels thats 20lbs your saving isnt gonna make a tremendous diff but im sure ull get a little more zip out of our little engines
__________________
I was 17-20 I lived the "Lifestyle". Fast cars, skanky hood rats, and stupid kids trying to prove who was faster. -Spades(the one and only street racer)
elsteverino889 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 12:56 PM   #40
fu_im_from_texas
 
fu_im_from_texas's Avatar
 
Drives: Liftback
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 137
Send a message via AIM to fu_im_from_texas
Smile two approaches, one answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggie™ View Post

...What you need to do is calculate "force", mass multiplied...
Biggie,
I am approaching the problem from an energy stand point. I base this approach on the first law of thermodynamics - a law that states there is a conservation of energy.

You are approching the problem from the standpoint of Force. You are useing Newtons second law of motion. F=ma...

Both are valid. There is 300+ years of emperical evidence that shows that conservation of energy, and F=ma will ultimately get you to the same answer. I am using conservation of energy because, in this case, it is the simpler approach...



Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggie™ View Post
... Try google...
I have a degree in mechanical engineering from the university of texas @ austin. I have taken several classes in physics, dynamics, and dynamic system controlls. My approach to the problem is correct. Google will give you a ton of information. Information is dangerous when it is applied incorrectly...

I am not trying to give you a hard time here, because we are all trying to figure out the same answer to the same tough problem ...
fu_im_from_texas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 01:15 PM   #41
fu_im_from_texas
 
fu_im_from_texas's Avatar
 
Drives: Liftback
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 137
Send a message via AIM to fu_im_from_texas
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by cleong View Post
I did some Googlesearching and came out more or less with the ratio of 1:4 (ie 1lb rim weight lost is as good as 4lbs static weight).

It is a best-fit rule of thumb that some people use to simplify the performance advantage of lighter cars.
I've heard "old timers" make a similar claim...only the ratio was 1:7 ...
fu_im_from_texas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 03:07 PM   #42
dallas
 
Drives: Yaris Hatch /Landrover D2
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 242
I did consider the tires in my weight, and yes the shorter sidewall helps, but the mass of a wheels weight is not in the spokes so if you move it 3" further from the hub even thought the tire tread is the same diameter away as the 14wheel, you have added more mass further from the hub over a stock 14" wheel. I have yet to find a 17" wheel tire combo that I can afford that would weight less than the stock 14 wheel and tire combo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaysE View Post
This is not necessarily true, because you're not taking the tires into account. Tires can typically weigh between 15 and 20 lbs, and if you maintain the overall diameter of the wheel/tire combo, a lighter weight wheel with a larger diameter would require a tire with a shorter sidewall, thus a lighter tire. Depending on the actual weights and wheel design, the mass can even be moved inward.
dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 08:13 PM   #43
cleong
Parallel Parking Pro
 
cleong's Avatar
 
Drives: Yaris 1.5 Manual
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by fu_im_from_texas View Post
I've heard "old timers" make a similar claim...only the ratio was 1:7 ...
There is a range of claims but 1:4 sounds a little less optimistic than a 1:7 ratio. My scanning of other internet forums suggests 1:4 is more commonly accepted.
__________________
Leong's NCP91 Toyota Yaris E
Hankook V12 Evo 195/55/15 on Buddy Club P1 replicas 15x7 ET +38
Stebel horns, Philips Silvervision turn indicator bulbs
TTE Lowering Springs, Camber bolts
TRD Blue brake pads
Fujitsubo Super Wagolis axleback exhaust
DC Sports header
cleong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 11:37 PM   #44
fu_im_from_texas
 
fu_im_from_texas's Avatar
 
Drives: Liftback
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 137
Send a message via AIM to fu_im_from_texas
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by cleong View Post
There is a range of claims but 1:4 sounds a little less optimistic than a 1:7 ratio. My scanning of other internet forums suggests 1:4 is more commonly accepted.
Then maybe my calculation of less than 1% is correct? If the stock wheel weight is 15-16lb and you went with a 10-11lb, then you would save ~5lbs per wheel, or 20lbs total. 20x4=80lbs... imagine a race between two stock Yari...the only difference being, one the driver weights 120lbs, the other 200lbs ... sounds like a dead heat to me?
fu_im_from_texas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 12:13 AM   #45
CaysE
That Focus Guy
 
CaysE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2004 Focus RSVT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 51
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, so based solely on the fact that you haven't been sarcastic in this thread yet, I'll guess that you seem to think both of those cars in your theoretical race will make it to the finish line at the same time?

I can tell you right now, 80 lbs will make a huge difference in a Yaris, and the 120lb driver will make it to the end first.
CaysE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 12:41 AM   #46
fu_im_from_texas
 
fu_im_from_texas's Avatar
 
Drives: Liftback
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 137
Send a message via AIM to fu_im_from_texas
Question 1%, 2.5%, 3%

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaysE View Post
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, so based solely on the fact that you haven't been sarcastic in this thread yet, I'll guess that you seem to think both of those cars in your theoretical race will make it to the finish line at the same time?

I can tell you right now, 80 lbs will make a huge difference in a Yaris, and the 120lb driver will make it to the end first.
I agree the lighter car would be faster...not sure that it would be by a large margin though... 80/2300 = .03 or 3%...is 3% that much greater than my less than 1% calculation? ... pretty close...

check out http://www.060calculator.com/

for 106hp and 2300lbs = 9.09 seconds
for 106hp and 2380lbs = 9.33 seconds

1-(9.09/9.33) = .025 or 2.5%

Is it safe to say that lighter rims will increase accelleration by less than 3%? Is 3% a huge difference? or is 3% a small difference? I could make strong arguments either way ...
fu_im_from_texas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 12:55 PM   #47
Biggie™
 
Biggie™'s Avatar
 
Drives: '07 3 Door Yaris of Doom!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Miller Motorsports Park
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by fu_im_from_texas View Post
Is 3% a huge difference?
Well, let's step back and look at this with a tad bit wider view. The Yaris isn't a dragster, nor is it an exceptional road racer. But when taking into account the fact it has a steering wheel and brakes, we'll head towards the road race/autoross (along with aggressive street driving) side of things when looking at the benefits of smaller wheels on a Yaris' over all performance.

Take that 3% improvement and factor it into not just acceleration, but braking and turning. In a 0-60 pull, you saved 0.22 of a second. Not really that much time. But that was when looking at less than 10 seconds of performance data.

Now go to an autocross. And for arguments sake we'll say the Yaris ran a 60 second lap. And to make it even more interesting we'll drop the performance gain of the wheels to only 1% do to the fact the car wont always be accelerating, decelerating or turning (even thou it will be doing two of these simultaneously for most of the event). That's only a performance gain of 6/10th of a second overall. But as anyone that has autocrossed knows, that is actually a HUGE amount of time when competing. Now go to a race track where lap times are a minute forty or more and you've just beat your previous time by over a second. Kind of scary when you start to think about it...
__________________
Biggie™ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 05:51 PM   #48
CaysE
That Focus Guy
 
CaysE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2004 Focus RSVT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 51
Biggie, I could not have explained it better.
CaysE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 03:51 AM   #49
fu_im_from_texas
 
fu_im_from_texas's Avatar
 
Drives: Liftback
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 137
Send a message via AIM to fu_im_from_texas
Smile even wider view

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggie™ View Post
Well, let's step back and look at this with a tad bit wider view...
of the 6000+ threads on yaris world 41 are under "Tracking, Racing, Auto-X Forum"


... the majoity of yaris owners will not notice a 1% increase in accelleration
fu_im_from_texas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 07:02 AM   #50
cleong
Parallel Parking Pro
 
cleong's Avatar
 
Drives: Yaris 1.5 Manual
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by fu_im_from_texas View Post
of the 6000+ threads on yaris world 41 are under "Tracking, Racing, Auto-X Forum"


... the majoity of yaris owners will not notice a 1% increase in accelleration
First you calculate that there is a small advantage to lighter wheels, then you call it insignificant because it is 0.000-something percent of gain. Then when proven otherwise, you change tack to say that the gain is irrelevant, since we are just discussing an econobox - a car that most Yaris owners don't drive competitively.

So have it your way, install your 17, 18, 19, even 20 inch wheels on your Yaris, it is your car anyway.

But you will see its effects in fuel consumption, and that doesn't fall under tracking, racing and autocross.
__________________
Leong's NCP91 Toyota Yaris E
Hankook V12 Evo 195/55/15 on Buddy Club P1 replicas 15x7 ET +38
Stebel horns, Philips Silvervision turn indicator bulbs
TTE Lowering Springs, Camber bolts
TRD Blue brake pads
Fujitsubo Super Wagolis axleback exhaust
DC Sports header
cleong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 05:41 PM   #51
Biggie™
 
Biggie™'s Avatar
 
Drives: '07 3 Door Yaris of Doom!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Miller Motorsports Park
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by fu_im_from_texas View Post
of the 6000+ threads on yaris world 41 are under "Tracking, Racing, Auto-X Forum"


... the majoity of yaris owners will not notice a 1% increase in accelleration
Well, there are close to 500 threads in the performance section, and most are looking for the ability to accelerate and or deceleration faster. That doesn't even take into account the hundreds of thread concerned with handling. Lighter wheels will improve maneuverability far more than a strut tower brace. So needless to say, the overall improvement lighter wheels give you would actually be interesting to more of this forums members than you first thought. I also used a 1% improvement in my example for the sake of argument. But again, a calculated rotational total reduction in weight of 80 pound from a 2300 pound Yaris is actually 3.47%. So go back and recalculate using that.

Now on to the real fun, I know this will go a little beyond light weight but smaller and lighter are even better... ;)

Using your reasoning, adding weight in the form of big heavy wheels and tires has a negligible effect. So with all the buckets of cash you get from your high paying engineering job, you go out and get some hot new 20 pound each 18X7.5s, for your luxury sport coupe Yaris. You also get yourself some nice 215/35-18s for that sweet low profile look that all the ladies like... Then there's me, with my job in the auto performance and motorsports industry. I go and find myself a set of 8.5 pound 13x7.5s along with some sweet lil' 215/50-13s.

One of my wheels and tires together runs just under 25 pounds each, while yours are coming in somewhere OVER 45 pounds. My tire is 21.46" tall, stock is 23.74"(we'll use this information later) and yours are 23.93" tall. Use this to determine the large amount of energy it will take you to turn your heavy wheel and tire when compared to my lighter and more compact wheel and tire unit. Don't forget most of your mass is almost an inch further out from center. And that's over 20 pounds per wheel and tire unit, using the simplified 4:1 ratio and multiplying it by 4 wheel and tire units we get 320 pounds! Do you still think the majority of Yaris owners will not notice a 7.2% advantage in acceleration, deceleration and changing direction?

Now, with your advanced engineering mathematics, go back up there and use the tire diameters(heights) I listed to determine my improved acceleration do to the lower gear ratio when compared to your slower than stock acceleration and higher gear ratio. And while we are dealing with tire diameters and such, determine the amount of additional energy the stock brakes will need to use to slow your taller and far heavier wheel/tire units when compared to my lil' guys.

But at the end of all this, the ladies love 18's... Luckily for me, I'm married so she'll just have to deal with my nimble little egg shaped ecno-box. And all those equations should keep you busy for awhile.
__________________
Biggie™ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 07:25 PM   #52
gaffo
 
Drives: integra
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: norman
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by brickhardmeat View Post
I doubt anything we could get are hands on in a 14 inch or more wheel size would be too light with a tire on it. I've never heard it put that way. I have heard about braking problems with oversized wheels. I think the lighter the better but then strength maybe an issue

MY little Ford Fiesta (German - not the Korean Festiva) had quite a bit of power 1.5 liter, and tiny wheels - 12". The front of the car was too light for the wheels (it was front wheel drive) and on a hard acceleration the wheels would start to "hop" - left then right then left then right (maybe 6 hops a second), like being on a vibrating bed LOL.

So wheels can be too light - but probably depends upon the car of course.

To note, the Fiesta could hawl ass, and ALMOST out accelerate the old bloated 305 8 cylender 1970'/80s Camaros everyone and their dog had in highschool in the 80's...................and the 6-cylender ones were utter DOGS - that Fiesta could beat any 6-banger Camaro easy.
gaffo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 07:43 PM   #53
gaffo
 
Drives: integra
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: norman
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggie™ View Post
Well, there are close to 500 threads in the performance section, and most are looking for the ability to accelerate and or deceleration faster. That doesn't even take into account the hundreds of thread concerned with handling. Lighter wheels will improve maneuverability far more than a strut tower brace. So needless to say, the overall improvement lighter wheels give you would actually be interesting to more of this forums members than you first thought. I also used a 1% improvement in my example for the sake of argument. But again, a calculated rotational total reduction in weight of 80 pound from a 2300 pound Yaris is actually 3.47%. So go back and recalculate using that.

Now on to the real fun, I know this will go a little beyond light weight but smaller and lighter are even better... ;)

Using your reasoning, adding weight in the form of big heavy wheels and tires has a negligible effect. So with all the buckets of cash you get from your high paying engineering job, you go out and get some hot new 20 pound each 18X7.5s, for your luxury sport coupe Yaris. You also get yourself some nice 215/35-18s for that sweet low profile look that all the ladies like... Then there's me, with my job in the auto performance and motorsports industry. I go and find myself a set of 8.5 pound 13x7.5s along with some sweet lil' 215/50-13s.

One of my wheels and tires together runs just under 25 pounds each, while yours are coming in somewhere OVER 45 pounds. My tire is 21.46" tall, stock is 23.74"(we'll use this information later) and yours are 23.93" tall. Use this to determine the large amount of energy it will take you to turn your heavy wheel and tire when compared to my lighter and more compact wheel and tire unit. Don't forget most of your mass is almost an inch further out from center. And that's over 20 pounds per wheel and tire unit, using the simplified 4:1 ratio and multiplying it by 4 wheel and tire units we get 320 pounds! Do you still think the majority of Yaris owners will not notice a 7.2% advantage in acceleration, deceleration and changing direction?

Now, with your advanced engineering mathematics, go back up there and use the tire diameters(heights) I listed to determine my improved acceleration do to the lower gear ratio when compared to your slower than stock acceleration and higher gear ratio. And while we are dealing with tire diameters and such, determine the amount of additional energy the stock brakes will need to use to slow your taller and far heavier wheel/tire units when compared to my lil' guys.

But at the end of all this, the ladies love 18's... Luckily for me, I'm married so she'll just have to deal with my nimble little egg shaped ecno-box. And all those equations should keep you busy for awhile.


Single myself - but if the "Ladies" judge a man by his car:

1. screw em
2. I'm screwed if I'm driving a Yaris - even one with 24" wheels! ;-).

You sold me!!!!!!!!
I know TINY is more fun - period. my tiny 12" Fiesta tires and my 13" Tr7 tires were pure gokart heaven.

Question and recommendations need Sir!

1. that weight you gave 8-1/2 pounds - was that for steel or alluminum (I LOVE Smootie hubcap retro look so have no need for aluminum wheels).

2. any tire/wheel brand recommendations?

3. can we go even smaller on Yaris? 12" maybe?

..................

thank you for such an informative post sir!
gaffo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 12:29 AM   #54
CaysE
That Focus Guy
 
CaysE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2004 Focus RSVT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggie™ View Post
Well, there are close to 500 threads in the performance section, and most are looking for the ability to accelerate and or deceleration faster. That doesn't even take into account the hundreds of thread concerned with handling. Lighter wheels will improve maneuverability far more than a strut tower brace. So needless to say, the overall improvement lighter wheels give you would actually be interesting to more of this forums members than you first thought. I also used a 1% improvement in my example for the sake of argument. But again, a calculated rotational total reduction in weight of 80 pound from a 2300 pound Yaris is actually 3.47%. So go back and recalculate using that.

Now on to the real fun, I know this will go a little beyond light weight but smaller and lighter are even better... ;)

Using your reasoning, adding weight in the form of big heavy wheels and tires has a negligible effect. So with all the buckets of cash you get from your high paying engineering job, you go out and get some hot new 20 pound each 18X7.5s, for your luxury sport coupe Yaris. You also get yourself some nice 215/35-18s for that sweet low profile look that all the ladies like... Then there's me, with my job in the auto performance and motorsports industry. I go and find myself a set of 8.5 pound 13x7.5s along with some sweet lil' 215/50-13s.

One of my wheels and tires together runs just under 25 pounds each, while yours are coming in somewhere OVER 45 pounds. My tire is 21.46" tall, stock is 23.74"(we'll use this information later) and yours are 23.93" tall. Use this to determine the large amount of energy it will take you to turn your heavy wheel and tire when compared to my lighter and more compact wheel and tire unit. Don't forget most of your mass is almost an inch further out from center. And that's over 20 pounds per wheel and tire unit, using the simplified 4:1 ratio and multiplying it by 4 wheel and tire units we get 320 pounds! Do you still think the majority of Yaris owners will not notice a 7.2% advantage in acceleration, deceleration and changing direction?

Now, with your advanced engineering mathematics, go back up there and use the tire diameters(heights) I listed to determine my improved acceleration do to the lower gear ratio when compared to your slower than stock acceleration and higher gear ratio. And while we are dealing with tire diameters and such, determine the amount of additional energy the stock brakes will need to use to slow your taller and far heavier wheel/tire units when compared to my lil' guys.

But at the end of all this, the ladies love 18's... Luckily for me, I'm married so she'll just have to deal with my nimble little egg shaped ecno-box. And all those equations should keep you busy for awhile.
At the risk of sounding like an ass... OWNED!

I'm sorry, fu, I'm not usually a prick...
CaysE is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When will the Yaris hit the showrooms at dealers? Petrolhead New YARIS Purchase Forum 181 11-28-2011 07:03 AM
Feedback on these wheels BulletProofAuto Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack 21 06-04-2007 08:09 PM
Buddy Club Wheels BulletProofAuto Sponsors Classifieds Area 8 10-19-2006 06:55 PM
Do bigger wheels and tires improve performance Driver Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack 14 10-14-2006 06:01 PM
Enkei RZ5 wheels on Liftback kennywhy Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack 3 09-23-2006 04:22 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM.




YarisWorld
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.