|
12-07-2008, 12:03 PM | #1 |
Drives: Yaris Blue HB 5 speed Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: indiana
Posts: 13
|
Chevy Volt - future GM failure
$40,000 for a rushed to market 1st generation GM plug in car...it has failure written all over it even if GM slaps a 250,000 mile warranty it (which they won't).
|
12-07-2008, 12:10 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2008 Yaris Sedan Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Delaware/Connecticut
Posts: 609
|
I doubt that, the Prius wasn't much when it hit the dealerships and that didn't stop the buyers.
At the same time how can GM perfect the volt without actually releasing it? |
12-07-2008, 05:44 PM | #3 |
Banned
Drives: 2008 Yaris Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,034
|
Meanwhile with global warming legislation pending in the US Congress that will drive up the costs of coal fired electric power, one wonders how much of a bargain an all electric car will be.....
Gene |
12-07-2008, 06:00 PM | #4 | |
Steals terrorist's lunch
Drives: 2007 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,299
|
Quote:
I am not sure why you have the idea that an auto has to be released before it can be improved upon but that is just not so. There are several things that can be done to improve the Volt before it goes into production: 1) Make it a 4-5 seater. Coupes are impractical. 2) Focus it's strengths on range and efficiency rather than performance. Continuing to make vehicles based on hp, 0-60 times and top speeds far in excess of the highest speed limits the country has in place is idiotic and unreflective of the world we live in. 3) Stop self-enforcing the ridiculous idea that COTS batteries are not good enough for use in EVs. People have been driving successful EVs for decades on lead acid and NiMH batteries. About $25k of the Volt's cost is nothing but GM's own battery build. 4) Provide an extended warranty for the drive line and totally outsource it. No one trusts GM to be there, or at least to be fully functional, or to at least be autonomous, in the coming years.
__________________
- Brian Share the Road I often carry 2 carpool passengers and mountain bikes or snowboards/skis over a 4,500 foot elevation difference. Click the graphic above to see my detailed mileage logs. |
|
12-07-2008, 06:13 PM | #5 |
if they give gm, ford, and chrysler money for a bailout, which i don't like on principal, though which i as well realize may need to happen to save the us economy, i'm seriously considering not ever stepping into one of their dealerships again on the theory that they already have enough of my money (in the form of tax dollars) and i don't want to give them more.
|
|
12-07-2008, 06:16 PM | #6 | ||||
Banned
Drives: 2008 Yaris Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,034
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
GM probably chose a combination that reduced labor costs and price. That's not cheap to do. I personally think that they should go with a "pack" that has specified dimensions, ampacity and voltage and then outsource it. Aftermarket sales of such packs will help insure a good logistical train and reduce prices for consumers. You are correct about EVs. Some of the first automobiles were EVs and they probably used Lead-Acid batteries. Quote:
Gene PS This still does not address the issue of US power grid capacity. We cannot replace our current gasoline consumption with electric power over night. Last edited by GeneW; 12-07-2008 at 06:55 PM. |
||||
12-07-2008, 06:21 PM | #7 |
Banned
Drives: 2008 Yaris Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,034
|
GM has been working on electric cars for many years, at least since the 1990s. There is a good bit of experience with these sorts of things "out there", so the Volt isn't going to quite be a "Beta Model" running amok on the highways.
Gene |
12-07-2008, 07:03 PM | #8 |
Steals terrorist's lunch
Drives: 2007 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,299
|
Regarding the "butt dyno", if you ever look into building an EV one of the first things you'll find that you must choose between acceleration and top speed, between either of those and range, and between all of that and the weight of it.
Ergo focusing on performance kills the range. In the Volt GM is trying to get around this issue by installing a "range extending petrol engine". This adds tremendous cost and weight to the vehicle... all just for the butt dyno effect. It is a self defeating idea.
__________________
- Brian Share the Road I often carry 2 carpool passengers and mountain bikes or snowboards/skis over a 4,500 foot elevation difference. Click the graphic above to see my detailed mileage logs. |
12-07-2008, 07:12 PM | #9 |
The Toyota hybrid system is very good. The early generation rights were sold to Ford/Mercury for the mariner/escape hybrid...... the Nissan altima hybrid is Toyota technology seld to Nissan for a "limited" number of units to be produced.
Electric motors are instant torque and basically faster than a gas engine..... the CVT transmission is the answer to harness and put the power to good use. GM has tried to create a new technology as a result of pride. I wonder if it might look like a Neon soon!!
__________________
some people are little slinkies. . . . .they are really good for nothing. . . .but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs. Come to the DARKSIDE..... We have candy
|
|
12-07-2008, 08:33 PM | #10 | |
Drives: 2008 Yaris Sedan Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Delaware/Connecticut
Posts: 609
|
Apparently you believe that GM just thought of a Volt yesterday and decided to start selling them tomorrow. Of course they approved upon the original design but if an automaker just keeps improving upon a design and never releases it they will, 1, not get the real world information for the car, and 2, not accomplish anything as there is no point in a perfect car that is never released. Any automaker comes to a point on any model where they have to release it to the public and see what happens. You can't make a perfect vehicle without the real world results you get once they are sold to large amounts of people.
Also for people such as myself the fact that a car costs $22k doesnt make it unimportant if the car has problems. So I have no idea what that point is supposed to mean. As for your ways GM could improve the Volt; You are basically telling GM that to improve the car that must make it a completely different kind of car. That's like saying to improve the sweetness of a pepper you should turn it into a watermelon. GM decided on the type of car they wanted to build and they built exactly that. On a final note trust is a personal thing and your trusts don't match everyone else's. And any smart man will tell you that the first gen of a technology has nothing to do with trust but instead the willingness to pay for a technology which will be better and cheaper in just a few short years. Go find a first gen cell phone and you will see what I mean. Quote:
|
|
12-07-2008, 08:35 PM | #11 |
Drives: 2008 Yaris Sedan Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Delaware/Connecticut
Posts: 609
|
That's exactly my point. Toyota released the car, in Japan, people bought it, gave their feedback, and Toyota improved it.
|
12-07-2008, 10:26 PM | #12 |
Drives: Blazing Blue Liftback Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Port Angeles, Wa
Posts: 385
|
Why not just re-release the EV-1?????????
They already have the technology to build a decent commuter car that would be affordable to the unwashed masses. |
12-07-2008, 10:45 PM | #13 |
Banned
Drives: LB Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OH
Posts: 7,787
|
Although I applaud GM for any kind of action resembling effort, I boo them emphatically for bringing this piece of crap to the table. Seriously? A 2 seater EV that looks like the next Cobalt? I'm sitting on GM's left at the next party. I want in on what they're
Seriously, Honda and Toyota are so far ahead of the game it isn't even funny. |
12-08-2008, 12:15 PM | #14 |
Drives: 07 Yaris sedan Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Keremeos BC
Posts: 986
|
The EV-1 story is a prime example of GM's arrogance, and stupidity. It ran on lead-acid, off-the-shelf technology, and those who leased them wanted to keep them. So, in its wisdom, GM took the lot back and chopped them up into little pieces. Hell, they kept producing the Corvair for the public, why not the EV-1???
And who in their right mind is going to pay 25G for a replacement battery? |
12-08-2008, 02:59 PM | #15 |
Drives: 2005 Scion xB Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Black Hills of South Dakota
Posts: 1,059
|
AT least Hummer was a good investment... GM is dying, why does it matter?
|
12-09-2008, 02:42 AM | #16 | ||
Banned
Drives: 2008 Yaris Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,034
|
Quote:
There might be a way to get around some of these issues but like it or not you have to build what the public wants to buy. GM's North American operations must hew to what the public wants, something that it neglected when it kept pumping out SUVs while gasoline rose to above $4.00 a gallon. There are two issues that I have with EVs. One is the inescapable idea that there is not enough electrical generating capacity in the US to replace our daily consumption of gasoline. It's pathetically short, about a quarter to a third of the total calories in terms of gasoline are produced each day in the US in terms of electrical energy. Even if we doubled the fleet efficiency, and that's a tall order in itself, we still would experience shortfalls in supply needed to get people around. Two is the shortage of public places to recharge the batteries of EVs. The power requirements needed to recharge an EV are not trivial and require a good bit of current at common household voltages in order to recharge them in under a few hours. EVs will never become common place until these two hurdles are over come. Much as I personally and professionally would like to see more EVs on the road, preferably with my employer's technology used in at least some of them this is a reality of this time and place. Quote:
I liken the inclusion of a gasoline motor to be alike the old "hitching points" on the earliest cars so they could be moved around when they were broken down. Gene |
||
12-09-2008, 03:01 AM | #17 | |||
Banned
Drives: 2008 Yaris Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,034
|
Quote:
I knew a lot of people who owned Corvairs and liked them a lot. There are still Corvair enthusiasts out there with Corvairs. They were never a car for me, not after I watched a neighbor's Corvair burst into flames one day. Quote:
The Wiki article on the EV-1 speaks about a lot of different possibilities for their EV program, including a hybrid vehicle, a diesel recharging system a CNG vehicle and a three different versions of storage batteries for the EV. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_EV1 Quote:
Gene |
|||
12-09-2008, 10:14 AM | #18 |
Steals terrorist's lunch
Drives: 2007 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,299
|
Gene,
You are reading a highly sanitized version of the EV1 story. I urge you to watch the "Who Killed the Electric Car" documentary for a more thorough account.
__________________
- Brian Share the Road I often carry 2 carpool passengers and mountain bikes or snowboards/skis over a 4,500 foot elevation difference. Click the graphic above to see my detailed mileage logs. |
|
|