Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinoCharles
OK, your scenario. She gets no aid from the government. Then what? 14 starving children on the streets of America, with a crazy mother. Great idea.
There are other ways to combat those who milk the system. She should be in jail for child endangerment. Those 14 children should be in a foster system that works... one without the overhead. Most of our government still runs on 70's-era paper trails. Regardless, you attack this with policy, not with a cold shoulder. You could apply that idea to most cases where the government provides aid to those who claim to need it.
The doctor should be prosecuted as well, if there is any precedent for it. I'm no law major.
And don't EVER forget, there ARE people that do NEED it. Cut disability from those with Autism? Not in my country.
|
sorry to burst your bubble but those children should have never come to be, none of them. Miracle of modern fucking science, good to an extent but everyone finds a way to abuse something good. There is no reason for the doctor to be persecuted. He did as the law and Unfortunately that is the way the law is; He did as the patient requested, he gave the medical advice as to her safety, if she refuses the doctors can't force her to get an abortion.
I am also tired of the government rewarding ignorance and stupidity. Law after law to protect the everyday moron that puts his foot into a woodchipper to unjam that stuck stump. Forced preservation of the weak and those who don't want to work only perpetuates the stupidity and ignorance. government likes its population, stupid, ignorant, and quiet; Smart people talk back and argue with its government.
If you believe the sense of morals that society has beaten into you then believe them. I personally do not simply accept "morality" based on what some dickhead with a psych degree decides is right or wrong. I think on my own and come to my own conclusions.