DFW Dyno Day 10/10

[frownonfun]

Originally Posted by ozmdd

Yeah, people claim that the Mustang dyno reads lower than the Dynojet, pretty universally. But there is also debate as to which one is more accurate. Still, there is no consensus on how much, and every A/B comparison I could find on the web involved cars with 3-6 times the HP we put down, so its not really apples-to-apples in simply figuring a %.
I think you can safely assume that you'd run a higher # on a Dynojet, but what that actually means, I couldn't say.
At this point, I'm sticking with the stated #'s. I seriously doubt its off by more than 2-3 HP.

that sounds about right to me. i wasn't aware that it was a universal claim. this whole dyno thing is fairly new to me. shocker right? lol. but i did get the feeling that i was either getting told inacurate info or he was just saying what i wanted to hear when he said i'm probably closer to 145whp.

at the end of the day though i'm happy with the numbers i put up without the adjustment anyway but i just don't want anyone reading these threads and coming away with unrealistic numbers. full disclosure kinda thing.

[ozmdd]

Originally Posted by frownonfun

that sounds about right to me. i wasn't aware that it was a universal claim. this whole dyno thing is fairly new to me. shocker right? lol. but i did get the feeling that i was either getting told inacurate info or he was just saying what i wanted to hear when he said i'm probably closer to 145whp.

at the end of the day though i'm happy with the numbers i put up without the adjustment anyway but i just don't want anyone reading these threads and coming away with unrealistic numbers. full disclosure kinda thing.

Its probably closer to 8-10 for yours, give or take.

[thebarber]

Originally Posted by ozmdd

Its probably closer to 8-10 for yours, give or take.

what would make his dyno 8-10whp off and yours not?