Remember to VOTE!

[dvlnblkdrs]

i voted too! absentee ftw!


is it bad that i refuse to let people merge in front of me if i see they have a yes on prop 8 sticker on their car(prop 8 is our measure that will get rid of the right for gay marriage..)


i'm so mean! lol

[bdc87]

I voted absentee, had too there was not 250 registered voters in my area to have a voting place.

And for DVLN, If had I hummer I would think about running over cars with those for Yes on 8 Stickers.

[bobby]

Originally Posted by dvlnblkdrs

i voted too! absentee ftw!


is it bad that i refuse to let people merge in front of me if i see they have a yes on prop 8 sticker on their car(prop 8 is our measure that will get rid of the right for gay marriage..)


i'm so mean! lol

No, it just means that you're not a stupid, ignorant bigot.

[PaidTimeOff]

Originally Posted by TinyGiant

they make it easy for me.. the closest voting location is 3 streets down from my house :) and i happen to have the 4th off :)

I got you beat! My voting location is literally 1 minute walk from my house. I live right behind an elementary school. Too bad I'm probably gonna have to drive from my workplace 20 minutes away to the school on Nov 4th since I have work that day. D'OH! /facepalm

[gm830]

Originally Posted by dvlnblkdrs

i voted too! absentee ftw!


is it bad that i refuse to let people merge in front of me if i see they have a yes on prop 8 sticker on their car(prop 8 is our measure that will get rid of the right for gay marriage..)


i'm so mean! lol

I love you

[dvlnblkdrs]

hah.. everyone needs some love, its nobodys right to say who we love.. i love my car, is that wrong too?

[PetersRedYaris]

Bobby, the next Caviatipse???

[tk-421]

If you guys are to vote on electronic ballots, you may want to document your experience using pictures or video. I've already read news of "computer glitches" going on in WV where the vote was changed to the other candidate on some occasions.

I'm just sayin'... Better to be safe than sorry.

[PetersRedYaris]

Sadly, there are so many problems with voting from "hanging chads", to false voter registration (thanks ACORN), to abscente ballots going missing. Who really win's when this occures, not the people.

I'll vote, but will it be counted, I'll never know...

[dvlnblkdrs]

meh, the electoral college will change all the votes anyway.. so who cares if a few thousand go missing or mess up.. lol

[ChinoCharles]

I'm voting!!!!!!

[pixiedixie862]

will be voting :)

[GeneW]

Originally Posted by bobby

Don't forget to vote, and vote for Obama!!

If you're voting for McCain/Bush, don't.

If you want what we've had since 1933 either McCain or Obama would be great choices. Aside some paint and a little body styling both choices "under the hood" are pretty similar.

If you're happy with sending our kids over seas to die than both would be great choices. Obama would rather that they die in Afghanistan than Iraq and has said he will "beef up" US forces there, in the "Graveyard of Empires".

If you want to sacrifice a little temporary safety, especially your right to choose effective means of self defense, both men are great choices. Obama is a bit more radical but McCain also supports some expansion of gun control.

If you want to sacrifice your future and job, and the future of your children, to satisfy those who push Junk Science and phony Nature Worship, both men support "Global Warming" legislation that takes our manufacturing work and sends it to China, India and other countries which are exempt from Kyoto.

By all means, if you want to pay more for electricity, gasoline, to heat your home and risk losing your job to some place that will not have to adhere to the Kyoto limitations, than either Man is a good choice for your vote.

If you were angry about the "Bank Bailout" and felt that it was wrong to give Banks almost a trillion dollars that you and your children and grandchildren will pay back than either candidate is a fine choice. Both men supported the bailout.

If you are happy with the progress of the "War on Drugs", feel that Prohibition works, and that having two million people in jail - mostly for drug crimes - is a good thing, than either candidate will fill the bill for you.

If you're happy with the "War on Terror" than either candidate will do fine for you.


If you're happy with the situation, like to be told that a candidate who is like Bush and Clinton is "normal" and that a candidate who is like Jimmy Carter and Lyndon Baines Johnson is somehow "Change" than by all means pick either man.


On the other hand, if you're tired of the same old shit and want to vote for something, instead of voting against Bush, or against Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, consider voting for Bob Barr.

Will Bob Barr win? Probably not.

Will a vote for Bob Barr send a message to the Republicans and Democrats that you're tired of the mental pygmies who they've chosen as "candidates", yes!

America can do better than a tired old man with anger issues who ought to retire and soak up sun, or a Chicago Bag Man who has never made a payroll and who skates along on his Cult of Personality. The only way that this will happen is if candidates like Bob Barr get votes and the Elite's two favorites do not.

A vote for Bob Barr is a vote for something, and not a vote against something, except a vote against the same old shit.

Gene

[GeneW]

Originally Posted by dvlnblkdrs

meh, the electoral college will change all the votes anyway.. so who cares if a few thousand go missing or mess up.. lol

If the Electoral Collage were repealed that would shift political power to the cities. Us folks in Rural Areas might have to cut off your electricity, food and water until you all saw "reason".

Be grateful for a little leveling, Devil. Keeps us folks in 'Burbs and Sticks tranquil and out of your faces. Also keeps the lights on, the water running and the food coming along.

Gene

[PETERPOOP]

Don't vote!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX40RsSLwF4

[dvlnblkdrs]

hmmm idk about that.. its difficult as it is to have a political conversation without issues, as we have all seen here.. imo if they think they know what is best for us.. why vote if they are deciding for us.. and didnt they put bush into the second term? i dont keep up on politics cuz everything is bias...

[PaidTimeOff]

I thought the idea was to keep political opinions out of this thread?

Gene, please don't feed the troll.

[GeneW]

Originally Posted by dvlnblkdrs

hmmm idk about that.. its difficult as it is to have a political conversation without issues, as we have all seen here.. imo if they think they know what is best for us.. why vote if they are deciding for us..

The Electoral Collage is a throwback to a time when we didn't have instant communications. Yet it serves a purpose.

The idea is to give uniform regions of the country an equal voice in choosing the President. Urban areas do not get more of a voice than rural areas and thus cannot use their weight to push us around.

The Collage does not "choose' a President. That's non-sense. They vote for a President based upon the State's popular vote. This is the way it's supposed to go unless you get a "Faithless Elector", who will not go along with the State's popular vote. Gore in 2000 tried to get some of the electors to change their votes from Bush to him but it did not work.

Originally Posted by dvlnblkdrs

and didnt they put bush into the second term? i dont keep up on politics cuz everything is bias...

No. That was the first run, in 2000. Gore got a majority of the popular vote but still lost the election because of recounts in Florida.

Gore had a PR firm ready to challenge votes in Southern Florida based upon their antique ballots. People were to complain to this firm that they were "not sure" who they voted for because the ballots used punch out "chads" instead of voting machines or the easily manipulated machines that we use today. Gore did this in case he lost the counts there.

Soon after the results from Florida were announced the PR firm sprung into action. Elderly voters complained that they were cheated because they were confused by the instructions, because the "chads" did not punch out and a lot of other silly crap.

Gore wanted the recounts limited to "Democratic strongholds" in Dade County and a few other places. The Republicans complained that this favored Gore and wanted the recount to cover all of Florida. The Florida Supreme Court was heavily Democrat and limited counting to the counties Gore wanted. The US Supreme Court allowed the recount all over the State, and hence some have claimed that they "picked the President", which is patent horseshit.

The recounts were farcical. If the counter wasn't sure if the vote was for Gore or Bush they checked out other votes. This often happened if both chads were punched out. If most of them were for a Democrat they picked Gore and vice versa. Some Republican observers claimed that some counters would punch out both chads and then give the vote to Gore. The Democrats complained that Bush's hatchetman in Florida, James Baker, was using Cuban "thugs" to "intimidate" the counters.

In fact a conservative group did storm the Bureau of Elections in Dade County to protest the vote counting.

A study after the election, conducted by the New York Times, claimed that the recount was honest. Gore really did lose the election.


The Bush Kerry contest centered in Ohio and allegations of irregular counts, especially of voting precincts in urban areas being jammed with voters while rural precincts had few lines. This is a far complaint and I suspect it has been addressed since 2004.

Yet in Pennsylvania mental patients were taken to voting polls and given cigarettes in exchange for votes for Kerry. There were also allegations of ACORN buying registrations, including for cartoon characters.

Nobody bothered to ask why Philadelphia PA had a 104 percent turnout - 104 percent of registered voters voted, and that Kerry won there. Kind of hard to have more voters than you have registrations, huh? This result was published in a local newspaper and to this day I cannot understand why it was not investigated.

This next contest will probably be another scrap over allegations that the voting machines did not "take" certain votes. Since 2000 it's been lawyered to death.

Bias? You live in California. Everything out there is political, sad to say.

Gene