Suggestion For Automakers

[Rockstar]

I don't believe it would sell well here in Australia. Safety features like abs, traction control, etc is a must. People wouldn't buy a car with technology from 10 years ago. You could always buy those tiny euro style cars that have a 1L 3cylinder engine.

[bronsin]

Originally Posted by Rockstar

I don't believe it would sell well here in Australia. Safety features like abs, traction control, etc is a must. People wouldn't buy a car with technology from 10 years ago. You could always buy those tiny euro style cars that have a 1L 3cylinder engine.

But those things dont actually DO anything. Studies in Germany indicate that drivers with ABS have only marginally better safety records statistically. Why?
Because they tend to drive faster and more agressively reasoning ABS will keep them safe. ABS actually INCREASES accidents. I was taught to SLOW DOWN and pump the brakes. (which ABS does) Its not necessary for an educated driver.

Ditto airbags. Airbag deployment increases finger and arm injury.

No what people who ride motorcycles know is being CAREFULL and thoughtfull as you drive is what makes you safe. NOT added on gizmos and gadgets.

Of course things like the elimination of sharp objects like horn rings that break and become stabbing objects in an accident is good.

People are advertising driven crazy about safety. They think "technology" will solve all their problems.

[Rockstar]

Originally Posted by bronsin

But those things dont actually DO anything. Studies in Germany indicate that drivers with ABS have only marginally better safety records statistically. Why?
Because they tend to drive faster and more agressively reasoning ABS will keep them safe. ABS actually INCREASES accidents. I was taught to SLOW DOWN and pump the brakes. (which ABS does) Its not necessary for an educated driver.

Ditto airbags. Airbag deployment increases finger and arm injury.

No what people who ride motorcycles know is being CAREFULL and thoughtfull as you drive is what makes you safe. NOT added on gizmos and gadgets.

Of course things like the elimination of sharp objects like horn rings that break and become stabbing objects in an accident is good.

People are advertising driven crazy about safety. They think "technology" will solve all their problems.

Sorry i think my choice of words has created a misunderstanding. By 'must', I meant its a legal requirement to have them on new cars (dam government)....

I would agree, I say too many electronics safety stuff is useless and heavy.

I learnt how to drive on an old car with no electronics, nothing but the minimum stuff from 1980's and this really taught me how to drive properly

[jayeh]

Originally Posted by bronsin

Why isnt anyone in the industry building an economy dedicated car? People will buy it not because of the social status that comes with a car but solely for the fuel economy. (and lets throw in Toyota durability to sweeten the deal)

Like the Smart it could have a 1000 cc engine. Who cares if it takes 20 seconds to get to 60 mph? It wouldnt need silly features like ABS, traction control, keyless entry and power locks, windows, and mirrors.

We could throw the silly EPA mileage numbers out the window also. The car would come with its own manual showing how to drive it for max mpg. So if testing and technique achieved 50 mpg there would be diirections as to how to GET 50 mpg. They could advertise "this car gets 50 mpg" and put that on the sticker. There would be no disappointments.

Perhaps the manufacturer could get the government to waive silly safety and emission requirements. I mean, it would get all the safety features and emission requirements up to say 2001. Riding a motorcycle as I do (which doesnt even have seatbelts) safety starts and ends in your head, not in the features of the car. Exempting the car from these things would also make the car cheaper and save money.

It might even help the economy, providing people with cheap reliable transportation. The car might even prove so popular it would sell in the millions, providing out of work people with good jobs.

Am I wrong?

What say you?

It'll never happen.

People in the US think that the Civic is frighteningly small and underpowered car. In the rest of the world it's a decently powered family car. Americans wouldn't consider it a family car. The opinion of sub compacts gets worse the smaller they get. Social status is a HUGE thing with cars.

As for the 0-60 times, people are dumb. This is why modern cars have their gas pedals programmed be so damn jumpy. If you test drive a brand new car with a touchy electronic throttle and then a much more powerful car with a more linear throttle control most people would say the e-throttle car is more powerful.

People buy cars based on electronic gimmicks, nobody is going to buy a car without a pile of gadgets.Stripping out all the electronic gadgets isn't necessarily going to save much money anyway. Look at cruise control for an example, its already a function of the ECU on the Yaris but they charge hundreds of dollars for the switch to turn it on. Its not like in the 90's when you had a vacuum controlled cruise control system.

The safety features will never be removed. Ever. Especially in America. If they do then it'll open the manufactures up to far too many law suits. It'll cost a lot to insure a car that doesn't have modern safety features. Never going to happen!

Lastly, this car already exists and its called the Tata Nano

Also, IMO, We don't need more cars. Urban sprawl isn't good, insisting on building communities where everyone needs to drive isn't sustainable. Public transit is the way to go. As a car/driving enthusiast the last thing I want to see is more people on the road.

Originally Posted by Kaotic Lazagna

One reason, America. Americans tend to like bigger cars with some power. That's slowly changing, but that's the problem, SLOWLY.

Agreed. People also need to realize that power and speed don't get you out of trouble, only in to more trouble.

Originally Posted by edmscan

Now .. the speed we go in our Yaris'. I don't know about you .. but people here get PISSED OFF when they are behind me at a light. I go from the light .. and you can see them just about rear ending me. Why .. cause the Yaris can only go so fast off the light and I will be the first to tell you that it just isn't fast enough.

Re the silly features. Well I for one WANT THE SILLY FEATURES and am happy to pay for them. First of all .. air bags and the other safety features. I will take them all .. and you should too. Cause they are what protects us in an accident. When you drive a subcompact you need all the help you can get. Just like when you ride a bike ... cause you may not be the one at fault, but you are the one going to get the worst of it against a car. It is the same when we go up against a much bigger vehicle (which is most likely the case when you drive a Yaris) ... I don't think I have to say more.

Is that related to your driving style? I'm usually first off the line in my 1.8L Corolla here in Ontario and it takes everyone a bit to catch up. I'll usually accelerate up to 10 over the speed limit and lock in my cruise control and then a few seconds later everyone who was stopped next to me will pass. Albeit the Corolla does have a bit more power than the Yaris.

When I was in Saskatchewan every car that passed me was from Alberta. They would tailgate me until they could pass, and a few times I swore they were going to pass me by cutting through a wheat field. Thankfully they actually know how to pass, unlike Ontario residents who will pass you at light speed just to slow down in front of you, and of course will pass you again once you pass them. It's not about passing cars that are travelling slower than you, it's apparently a race and you need to come in first.

[edmscan]

Originally Posted by jayeh

Is that related to your driving style?

When I was in Saskatchewan every car that passed me was from Alberta.

Yes .. it could be. I have a 5 speed .. so I shift at 20/40 and 50 km, so I have to shift 3x before I hit the speed limit. It is a little different than most other vehicles .. when they just have to "tramp on it". I don't let it bother me .. if they don't like it .. they can just pass me as I almost always drive in the right lane.

Oh yea .. Alberta drivers. They are pretty special .. as you found out. It is a big race and you do see it often.

Re this thread .... I think that you have hit the nail on the head. Very very well spoken.

[nookandcrannycar]

Originally Posted by edmscan

Yes .. it could be. I have a 5 speed .. so I shift at 20/40 and 50 km, so I have to shift 3x before I hit the speed limit. It is a little different than most other vehicles .. when they just have to "tramp on it". I don't let it bother me .. if they don't like it .. they can just pass me as I almost always drive in the right lane.

Oh yea .. Alberta drivers. They are pretty special .. as you found out. It is a big race and you do see it often.

Re this thread .... I think that you have hit the nail on the head. Very very well spoken.

It sounds as if drivers in Alberta have become more like drivers in the S.F. Bay Area in the last 6 years.

[nookandcrannycar]

Originally Posted by jayeh

It'll never happen.

People in the US think that the Civic is frighteningly small and underpowered car. In the rest of the world it's a decently powered family car. Americans wouldn't consider it a family car. The opinion of sub compacts gets worse the smaller they get. Social status is a HUGE thing with cars.

As for the 0-60 times, people are dumb. This is why modern cars have their gas pedals programmed be so damn jumpy. If you test drive a brand new car with a touchy electronic throttle and then a much more powerful car with a more linear throttle control most people would say the e-throttle car is more powerful.

People buy cars based on electronic gimmicks, nobody is going to buy a car without a pile of gadgets.Stripping out all the electronic gadgets isn't necessarily going to save much money anyway. Look at cruise control for an example, its already a function of the ECU on the Yaris but they charge hundreds of dollars for the switch to turn it on. Its not like in the 90's when you had a vacuum controlled cruise control system.

The safety features will never be removed. Ever. Especially in America. If they do then it'll open the manufactures up to far too many law suits. It'll cost a lot to insure a car that doesn't have modern safety features. Never going to happen!

Lastly, this car already exists and its called the Tata Nano

Also, IMO, We don't need more cars. Urban sprawl isn't good, insisting on building communities where everyone needs to drive isn't sustainable. Public transit is the way to go. As a car/driving enthusiast the last thing I want to see is more people on the road.


Agreed. People also need to realize that power and speed don't get you out of trouble, only in to more trouble.


Is that related to your driving style? I'm usually first off the line in my 1.8L Corolla here in Ontario and it takes everyone a bit to catch up. I'll usually accelerate up to 10 over the speed limit and lock in my cruise control and then a few seconds later everyone who was stopped next to me will pass. Albeit the Corolla does have a bit more power than the Yaris.

When I was in Saskatchewan every car that passed me was from Alberta. They would tailgate me until they could pass, and a few times I swore they were going to pass me by cutting through a wheat field. Thankfully they actually know how to pass, unlike Ontario residents who will pass you at light speed just to slow down in front of you, and of course will pass you again once you pass them. It's not about passing cars that are travelling slower than you, it's apparently a race and you need to come in first.

I found Albertans to be friendly, but (in other Canadian provinces) I found a somewhat negative and ever so slightly envious attitude about Albertans from other Canadians.....kind of like how other Europeans (especially other Scandinavians) feel about Norwegians.

Re the 'pass you at light speed just to slow down in front of you' OMG...In the U.S. I have only seen drivers in Texas do this and they do it ALL THE TIME, and to make it worse, many do this 1 block or 1/2 a block before they are going to turn off the road! This 'pass you at light speed just to slow down' maneuver is the worst and most irritating thing drivers do in Texas....worse than the 'Speed Racer' types on the freeway.

Earlier today I was having a conversation about the difference between traffic in Houston and L.A. with both of us being familiar with both. The other person said that in a way Houston is worse because someone will be driving along at normal speed or too fast and not expecting traffic and then will encounter just about instantaneous gridlock, isn't paying enough attention, and causes an accident. He said this happens a bit less often in L.A. because there is more gridlock or near gridlock at more times of the day than in Houston, and I'd have to say that I agree.

Re 'social status is a HUGE thing with cars' (in the U.S.)....I would say only with insecure nouveau riche people.

We used to have more public transportation in SOME areas in the U.S., but 50 plus years ago some auto manufacturers and tire companies bought out some of these systems and shut them down.

Re 'apparently it's a race and you need to come in first' .....these drivers are childish.

[edmscan]

Originally Posted by nookandcrannycar

I found Albertans to be friendly, but (in other Canadian provinces) I found a somewhat negative and ever so slightly envious attitude about Albertans from other Canadians.....

I am going to keep this brief .. and try not to piss off too many Canadians at the same time.

Let me just say that Alberta is considered the HAVE province and the other provinces know it. We don't have a sales tax (but we do gas our own cars unlike Oregon) and we have lots of oil resources so when **** hits the fan and the economy tanks we still have money in the bank.

Alberta is the only province with no debt .. and people from other provinces when they need a job make the trip to Alberta cause jobs are easy to come by here. In fact they are predicting a labour shortage in the years ahead. Even BC (one of our closest neighbors) is pissed at us as they want some of the billions of dollars from a planned pipeline which would go to the west coast.

The sharing of resource revenues is not normally done (and thus why Alberta is considered a rich province) and the rest of Canada is pretty much pissed as the Alberta government won't share with the other provinces when it comes to our wealth.

Oh yea .. re this thread. If people want a 50 MPG car .. they should just buy the Prius C. No problem getting 50 MPG in the city .... a friend of mine has one and it is a pretty nice car.

[jayeh]

Originally Posted by edmscan

Let me just say that Alberta is considered the HAVE province and the other provinces know it. We don't have a sales tax (but we do gas our own cars unlike Oregon) and we have lots of oil resources so when **** hits the fan and the economy tanks we still have money in the bank.

Hey! Speak for yourself, Ontario is a have province. We HAVE: expensive auto insurance, expensive booze, Ottawa and Toronto. We have lots of things!